Cymru Marketing Journal - (CMJUK) - Online Business Journal & Digital Marketing Agency. Business News, Directory, SEO, Social Media Management, Advertising, Reviews, Forum, Market Research, Content Writing & Website Design. Thinking Local, Acting Global.


Authoritarian Regimes Ban Books: Suppressing Knowledge

Book Bans

Authoritarian Regimes Ban Books: Suppressing Knowledge and Freedom of Expression

Books have long been a symbol of knowledge, enlightenment, and the free exchange of ideas. However, in authoritarian regimes around the world, books are often viewed as a threat to the ruling powers. These regimes use book bans and censorship as a means to control information, shape public opinion, and maintain their grip on power.

Authoritarian regimes ban books for a variety of reasons, all of which serve their overarching goals of maintaining control and suppressing dissent.

  1. Ideological Control: Authoritarian regimes often have a specific ideology or narrative they seek to impose on their citizens. Books that contradict or challenge this ideology are seen as a threat. By banning such books, these regimes aim to ensure that only their approved ideas and beliefs are disseminated.
  2. Suppressing Dissent: Books that criticize the government, its policies, or its leaders are a direct challenge to the regime’s authority. Banning such literature is a way to suppress dissenting voices and maintain a facade of unity and loyalty among the population.
  3. Protecting the Status Quo: Authoritarian leaders may fear that certain books could inspire movements for change, whether political, social, or cultural. Banning such works helps to preserve the status quo and prevent any potential threats to their rule.
  4. Controlling Information: In the digital age, access to information is a powerful tool. Banning books is a means to control the narrative and shape the worldview of the citizens. By limiting access to certain information, authoritarian regimes can manipulate public perception to their advantage.

Consequences of Book Bans

The consequences of banning books in authoritarian regimes are far-reaching and detrimental to both individuals and society as a whole.

  1. Suppression of Knowledge: Book bans deprive citizens of access to a wide range of ideas, perspectives, and information. This suppression of knowledge hampers intellectual growth and prevents individuals from making informed decisions.
  2. Violation of Freedom of Expression: Banning books is a clear violation of the fundamental human right to freedom of expression. It stifles creativity, hinders intellectual discourse, and creates a culture of fear where individuals are afraid to voice their opinions.
  3. Cultural Stagnation: By stifling dissent and banning books that challenge the status quo, authoritarian regimes stifle cultural innovation and creativity. This cultural stagnation can have long-term negative effects on a society’s development.
  4. Reinforcing Propaganda: Authoritarian regimes use book bans to reinforce their own propaganda and control the narrative. This can lead to a distorted and one-sided understanding of events and issues.
  5. Isolation: International isolation is often a consequence of book bans, as they are seen as a violation of human rights and freedom of expression. This isolation can have economic and diplomatic repercussions for the regime and the country as a whole.

Example of Classic Books To Be Banned From Schools

Classic books, known for their literary significance and cultural impact, have not been immune to censorship and bans. Various classic works of literature have faced challenges and attempts at censorship over the years, often due to controversial content, explicit language, or themes that some find objectionable. Here are some examples of classic books that have been banned or challenged:

  1. “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee: This Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, which addresses themes of racism and injustice in the American South, has faced numerous challenges in schools and libraries for its use of racial slurs and its portrayal of sensitive topics.
  2. “1984” by George Orwell: A dystopian classic, “1984” has been banned or challenged for its depiction of totalitarianism, censorship, and political manipulation. Some have found its content too disturbing or subversive.
  3. “Catcher in the Rye” by J.D. Salinger: This novel has faced bans and challenges for its profanity, sexual content, and discussions of mental health issues. It remains a frequently challenged book in schools.
  4. “The Great Gatsby” by F. Scott Fitzgerald: Despite its status as a literary masterpiece, “The Great Gatsby” has been challenged for its language and references to sexuality, alcohol, and materialism.
  5. “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley: Similar to “1984,” this dystopian novel has been banned for its themes of government control, drug use, and sexual content. It continues to spark debate about censorship.
  6. “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding: This classic exploration of human nature and societal breakdown has faced challenges in schools due to its violence, profanity, and dark themes.
  7. “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain: A novel that addresses racism and the American South during the 19th century, “Huckleberry Finn” has been challenged for its use of racial slurs and its portrayal of racial stereotypes.
  8. “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck: This novella, often assigned in schools, has faced challenges due to its themes of disability, racism, and profanity.
  9. “Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury: A book about book burning and censorship, “Fahrenheit 451” has faced irony in real life as it has been banned or challenged in various school districts for its themes.
  10. “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” by Ken Kesey: This novel, which deals with mental illness and the power struggle within a psychiatric hospital, has been challenged for its sexual content and language.

It’s important to note that the reasons for banning or challenging these classic books vary, and opinions on their suitability for different audiences differ as well. While these books have faced controversy, they are also celebrated for their literary merit and their ability to provoke thought and discussion on important social and philosophical issues.


“The World Has Gone Mad”

Authoritarian regimes ban books as a means to control information, suppress dissent, and maintain their grip on power. However, these actions have severe consequences for the individuals living under such regimes and for society as a whole. The suppression of knowledge, violation of freedom of expression, cultural stagnation, and international isolation are all negative outcomes of book bans.

Efforts to combat book bans in authoritarian regimes often involve international pressure, support for independent publishers and writers, and the promotion of literature as a tool for positive change. It is essential to recognize and condemn book bans as a violation of fundamental human rights and to work towards a world where knowledge and free expression are celebrated and protected.

When children are taught profanities from an early age, and see violence in games and on TV, the pressing question is do certain groups promote narratives to fit their own agenda such as wokeism, just to have a reason to argue and are we being too sensitive for our own good?

There is evidence to suggest that exposure to violent media can lead to aggressive behavior in children. A study of middle school children found that those exposed to more profanity-laced TV shows or video games tended to use profanity themselves, and kids who used profanity, in turn, reported more instances of aggression. It’s important to note that the effects of media exposure on children’s behavior are complex and multifaceted. Other factors such as parental involvement, peer influence, and individual differences can also play a role.

As for the term “wokeism,” it is a term that has been used to describe a social and political movement advocating for social justice, equality, and the dismantling of systemic discrimination. The term “woke” originated from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) and means “alert to racial prejudice and discrimination”. It has since evolved to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities such as sexism and LGBT rights. The term “wokeism” is often used in a derogatory manner by those who oppose the movement.

It’s important to recognize that discussions around sensitive topics such as violence in media or social justice movements can be complex and nuanced. It’s essential to approach these discussions with an open mind, respect for different perspectives, and a willingness to learn from others.

Further Reading

Waiting To Be Arrested At Night — how to confront authoritarian power | Financial Times (


Cymru Marketing Content Writing Services

#censorship #authoritarianregimes #law #bookbans #authorianship #freedomofexpression #culturalstagnation #propaganda #knowledgesuppression #suppression #learninwales

Helena Kennedy KC: Protecting Justice from Authoritarian Attacks

Helena Kennedy KC: Protecting Justice from Authoritarian Attacks

Where the rule of law is the cornerstone of democracy, it is essential to uphold the principles of justice and protect the legal profession from undue attacks. Helena Kennedy KC, a distinguished British lawyer and Labour peer, has recently voiced her concerns about the state of the legal profession in the United Kingdom. In a scathing critique, Kennedy likened government attacks on the profession to tactics employed by authoritarian regimes. Her passionate defense of the legal system highlights the importance of preserving access to justice for all citizens and maintaining respect for the rule of law.

A Remarkable Legal Career

Before delving into Helena Kennedy’s critical remarks, it is crucial to recognize her exceptional career in the legal field. A leading criminal lawyer and Queen’s Counsel, Kennedy has earned a reputation for her unwavering commitment to justice and human rights. Throughout her career, she has championed the causes of marginalized communities and played a pivotal role in various high-profile cases. Her legal acumen and dedication have made her a respected figure not only within the legal community but also in the broader realm of human rights advocacy.

The Attack on the Legal Profession

Helena Kennedy’s recent comments revolve around her concerns regarding the UK government’s approach to the legal profession. She argues that ministers are actively undermining the integrity of the legal system by targeting lawyers and judges. Such attacks, she believes, are akin to the tactics employed by authoritarian regimes to discredit and silence dissent.

One of the central issues Kennedy highlights is the deliberate creation of scapegoats within the legal profession. By vilifying lawyers and judges, the government risks eroding public trust in the justice system. This, in turn, may have far-reaching consequences for the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

Access to Justice for All

Kennedy’s concerns are not unfounded. A cornerstone of any functioning democracy is the accessibility of justice to all its citizens, regardless of their socioeconomic background. The justice system should not be a privilege enjoyed solely by the wealthy; it must be accessible to everyone.

The disparagement of lawyers and judges can have a chilling effect on individuals seeking justice. It discourages talented individuals from pursuing careers in law and may deter those in need from seeking legal assistance. If citizens lose faith in the legal system, the consequences for society are profound, as the rule of law becomes compromised.

The Role of Lawyers and Judges

Lawyers and judges are the pillars of a fair and just society. They play a crucial role in ensuring that laws are upheld, rights are protected, and justice is served. Attacking the legal profession not only undermines the individuals within it but also threatens the very foundations of democracy.

Lawyers, in particular, are often seen as defenders of the vulnerable and as champions of justice. They provide a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves, ensuring that the rights of every citizen are respected. Judges, on the other hand, are responsible for impartially interpreting and applying the law. Both professions are vital to maintaining the balance of power in a democratic society.


Helena Kennedy KC’s stark warnings about the attacks on the legal profession in the UK should serve as a wake-up call to all who value democracy and the rule of law. Disparaging lawyers and judges not only undermines their vital roles but also erodes the trust of citizens in the justice system. In a functioning democracy, access to justice must be available to all, regardless of their background or means.

Governments and citizens alike must recognize the importance of a robust and independent legal profession. The rule of law and the principles of justice should always be protected and cherished, for they are the cornerstones upon which democracy is built. It is only through respect for these principles and the unwavering dedication of individuals like Helena Kennedy that we can ensure that justice is not a privilege for the wealthy but a right for all.

Further Reading


Cymru Marketing Content Writing Services

#censorship #authoritarian #authoritarianregimes #law #judges #legal #helenkennedykc #lawyers #solicitors #justice

Censorship & Racism


Censorship & Racism

I am reading an MSN news article today about Albanian gang members who killed a 23-year-old and dumped him ‘like rubbish’.

Albanian gang members killed a 23-year-old and dumped him ‘like rubbish’ (

This incident happened in my hometown of Cardiff and I really wanted to comment but I have been censored in the past for suggesting people start a petition over another incident and I have been warned that MSN (Microsoft) that I have to abide by their rules otherwise they can stop me from making my opinion known and eventually ban me.

What happened to free speech?

I wanted to actually address a few people making comments about (letting them in).

Does this mean a person from another country is inferior to you? A person from anywhere around the world is human, has the same red blood as you, and has just as much right to walk this planet as you have.

Reading the comment made my blood boil. I quote:

“if you don’t let them in this won’t happen anyone listening???????????????????????????????????”

I actually did comment by saying “your comment sounds very (R)”

I found this comment from someone else spot on:

“A drug granny who got stabbed to death storming a house with her sons, with machetes and axes in hand. Trying to collect a cannabis debt? She was very British. Care to explain that one? I find it laughable that the livestock of bigotville try to paint this picture that the UK was some kind of crime free utopia before minorities came over here”!

To read the rest of the comments you need to click the link


My father a polish soldier came to the UK to fight with the Brits and when WWII was over Winston Churchill as a thank-you granted all the Poles and their families permanent residency. Does that make me inferior because I have Polish Roots?

I was actually born in the UK and have been subjected to a lot of racism over the years. I was told on more than one occasion to go back to my own country or have been called a peasant (CD). Just because my ancestors worked on farms and fields does not equate to me being a milkmaid, I am a highly educated businesswoman and published author. Yet when you call people out for their rude remarks they turn it around by saying “I was only joking” or “you can’t take a joke”. Always, always “before opening your mouth put your brain in gear” and think if your joke may actually be offensive.

Racism From An Early Age

I was bullied and made fun of at the age of 5 when I could not speak English. This carried on through my teens and into my adult years. Because of this, I have not used my legal name, instead, use a pseudonym because of the racism I have encountered. It’s a very sad world we live in if you can be shamed for having a foreign surname.

The same people that are spouting that the UK is not racist are the same people that voted for us to leave the EU and now look at the mess we are in.

I am not condoning what this unfortunate soul that lost his life did, it does not matter what part of the world you come from, if you experience hardship there are some that will make bad choices.


I was not going to comment, but just in case my comment got censored again I decided to write this post and could say what I wanted on my own channel making my own rules. No one can censor me here, although I have learned a trick or two and that is to break the word up using symbols such as r#cism or abbreviate it (R).

I just find it so ironic that people saying immigrants were taking their jobs, where in reality were boosting the economy are now suffering the consequences due to the rise of the cost of living because of the trillions Briton owes due to leaving the EU (Brexit).

MSN Guidelines:

The Microsoft Start Community supports diverse, authentic conversations and content about issues and events that matter. This is a safe, inclusive, and respectful forum where participants are responsible for their posts and how they treat one another. Civil discussion requires respect, even in disagreement.

Our community guidelines are designed to uphold these values, and we strive to provide transparency and clear guidance on how to comply with them.

We may remove the content in line with local cultural conditions in different parts of the world. Commenting features may be deactivated when required by law, or when engagement has persistency violated our community guidelines.

While the Code of Conduct section of the Microsoft Services Agreement applies to all Microsoft products, we believe the Microsoft Start Community will benefit from having a more specific explanation of how the Code and MSA apply to this community.

Trusted Community Engagement and Contributions | Guidelines (

What MSN omits to say you can not encourage the community to do something like start a petition as I tried to say in a comment a few days ago.

#racism #immigration #racist #costofliving #inflation #economy #brexit

Censorship, Seizures & Oppression.


Censorship, Seizures & Oppression.

  1. Introduction – Censorship of Content.
  2. About Mike Mahoney.
  3. Forbidden Words.
  4. Freezing of Assets.
  5. Rob Moore (Entrepreneur and Author –
  6. Liquidating Assets.
  7. Freezing of Bank Accounts.
  8. History Repeats itself.
  9. Digital Assets.
  10. Money Laundering.
  11. Exporting Luxury Items to Russia.
  12. Conclusion.
  13. About Me – Security Experience.

1. Introduction – Censorship of Content.

Censorship, Seizures & Oppression. We are monitored for what we write, say, or do. We are being censored and we are slowly having our civil liberties taken away without realizing it. We are essentially batteries in the matrix.

When I write certain controversial articles I have found that I sometimes have to jump through hoops to get them published. I first noticed a few days ago when I tried publishing an article about fiat money and precious metals that it kept coming back with a 500 error message, I quickly came to the conclusion that the content in my article was being censored as it was of a sensitive nature.

I tried sharing ‘Mike Maloney’ “The Biggest Scam In The History of Mankind”

I have embedded the video. Below you will find in a previous article I have written all the forbidden words, that will get your website or channel banned. I have since added to the list some words that are reporting censorship problems like R#ss#a, P#tin, W#r, and C#nfl#ct Br#xit, L##kD#wn, C#vid. So even if you have written content or mentioned it verbally you may end up being struck off social media platforms or get penalized by search engines. I have purposely redacted certain letters and replaced them with hashtags to make it difficult for algorithms to decipher. You may see these words on other sites but do you actually want to run the risk of your website or channel being blocked?

2. About Mike Maloney.

Mike Maloney is the host of the smash-hit video series, Hidden Secrets of Money; former Rich Dad/Poor Dad advisor; and author of the best-selling precious metals book, Guide to Investing in Gold and Silver. For more than a decade, Mike’s traveled the world sharing his economic insights with audiences from Hong Kong to Rome and from Silicon Valley to Wall Street. ‘Mike Maloney’ “The Biggest Scam In The History of Mankind”

3. Forbidden Words.

I found from building websites that certain keywords are forbidden and if you own domain names with these words, Google or any other search engine will not index or rank your websites.


The same happened when I tried posting a “C#vid” domain for sale and got my internet provider blocking the post and had no choice but to delete it off my site.

Below you will see more keywords being censored:

(Just because you may see the words on other websites or social media platforms it is only a matter of time when algorithms crawl and flag them). You do not want your website or channel to disappear. Choose your words carefully. If you do want to use the words without using hashtags I suggest typing out your paragraph and embedding it as an image.


4. Freezing Assets

Somebody, that I follow and admire is a guy called “Rob Moore –” who made a valid point that I said I would share with my readers that the Oligarchs have had their assets frozen but have been trading in the UK since the mid-80s early 90s why were their assets not looked into then?

Why has it only just now come to light that these Oligarchs have connections with P#tin?

I speculate they were making large donations to the UK economy, so now they have served their purpose and any association that is deemed to fuel the fire has had their assets seized and has been booted out, which is double standard hypocrisy. I personally would not have done business with them from the start and would have refused donations.

Do the powers that be expect people to believe that such wealth may have come legitimately and why were no questions asked when Billions were put through our banking system, why were these people not vetted before they were allowed into this country, and why were people with such vast wealth were not investigated until now?

I remember a measly £50K coming into my bank account once and they were like rats down a sewer pipe, yet these people were never put under the radar until now.

Rob also went on to say we are being suppressed by censorship with our lack of ability to protest and our restrictions of freedom of speech if it is deemed we are found to step out of line, say, or do anything that goes against the beliefs of the powers that be, we will be punished. Mainstream media is dying hence why a lot of newspapers online are introducing paywalls giving you the first couple of lines of a news article and forcing you to pay to read the rest. Hence that is why there is an outcry about “Fake News” because unverified sources will not be credible and these news outlets do have to abide by a code of conduct and hence do not like social media platforms spreading news that is not sourced by them. Printed newspapers are declining and are being replaced by online apps and social media channels and podcasts.

5. Rob Moore.

Who is Rob More:

Rob Moore is a self-made property investor, businessman, entrepreneur, best-selling author, world record holder, speaker, pilot & proud dad, who co-owns 7 companies in property, lettings & finance.

6. Liquidating Assets.

What happens to all the seized mansions, superyachts, fine art, and supercars?

Will the assets be sold off to boost the UK economy or will they be sold or returned to the owners after the w#r is over?

In fact, who would buy assets that have been confiscated?

One has to wonder who will the Oligarchs support in this game of power. Their lifestyle will not be affected as no doubt they will have returned to their mansions in their homeland, they just will have to live off their worthless fiat currency.

7. Freezing Bank Accounts.

By freezing bank accounts, billionaires. millionaires or anyone with wealth will not just rely on fiat currency to survive. An era of cryptocurrency (ICOs) and NFTs can potentially make investments untraceable. Furthermore, how is P#tin still funding his w#r when his fiat money is not worth the paper it is printed on? He obviously has Gold, Precious Metals, Gems, and Diamonds. He may be also selling his crude oil to countries that do not oppose what he is doing.

8. History Repeating Itself.

On June 5, 1933, the United States went off the gold standard, a monetary system in which currency is backed by gold when Congress enacted a joint resolution nullifying the right of creditors to demand payment in gold. 1933 to 1974 it was illegal for U.S. citizens to own gold in the form of gold bullion, without a special license. On January 1, 1975, these restrictions were lifted and gold can now be freely held in the U.S. without any licensing or restrictions of any kind. and Executive Order 6102 which was signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt “forbidding the Hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States.” The executive order was made under the authority of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended by the Emergency Banking Act in March 1933. The limitation on gold ownership in the United States was repealed after President Gerald Ford signed a bill legalizing private ownership of gold coins, bars, and certificates by an Act of Congress, codified in Pub.L. 93–373, which went into effect December 31, 1974.

However, for the Russians, this will be another sanction that I think needs to be implemented to stop other countries from receiving their “Confl#ct Gold”. Any country that is deemed to trade Gold with Russia should be sanctioned.

It is only a matter of time before the west realizes that these Billionaires and P#tin will not be stopped unless the Gold trade is restricted and the Sale of Precious Metals and Gems in and out of Russia.

People trading precious metals and gems should perform due diligence on the buyer and the seller. I believe in paper trails.

Sanctions should be imposed to stop Russians from trading with Gold and other precious metals and gems.

9. Digital Assets.

I do believe there is another way and have suspected for some time that certain digital assets may have an element of money laundering going on, as an example, I just read today that some domain extensions ending with .xyz have sold for £50K in terms of SEO these domain extensions are worthless and not beneficial to any company.

I hear you…, 50K is nothing if you want to move money but what if you sold 20 of them you would have made £1M.

I personally would not use them or recommend anyone to buy them and I would certainly never spend ridiculous amounts of money on them. Furthermore, domain names rely on SEO and set parameters where you want the traffic to come from with GEO Fencing and GEO Targeting to be able to be indexed and ranked for the targetted location: Domains are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them unless they are short one-word dot coms or top-level domains and have equity attached to them.

10. Money Laundering.

Money Laundering is a serious offense that will land you behind bars.

You should do due diligence on transactions over £10,000 regardless if it is a domain name that you’ve sold or a bar of gold. It is worth noting that most marketplaces collect users’ data at the time of registration but if somebody is off the street you need to vet them

On 10 January 2020 changes to the Government’s Money Laundering Regulations came into force. They update the UK’s AML regime to incorporate international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and to transpose the EU’s 5th Money Laundering Directive.

11. Exporting Luxury Goods.

The UK has announced a ban on the export of Luxury Goods to Russia and Belarus, Apparel, Accessories, Jewellery, Luxury British Vehicles, Planes, and Yachts all will be banned from export.

According to Sky News, the new import duty hike will represent a 35 percentage point rise on current rates, which are different for each product, and will hit £900m worth of key products such as Russian vodka, metals, fertilizers, and other commodities, (yet in another breathe the UK are stopping all imports, so this seems to be unclear and rather confusing, either we are doing business with Russia or we are not) Any country that does business with Russia should be penalized?

All export finance support is also being withdrawn, meaning the UK will no longer issue any new guarantees, loans, and insurance for exports to the countries.

Does this mean that these luxury brands that have lost one source of income will put their prices up to meet their losses? Bond Street Jewellers and Aston Martins, McLarens, and Bentleys all may go up in price.

12. Conclusion.

The safest way to store your wealth is by investing in gold. Gold Bullion comes in many forms, it could be coins, ingots, bars, or jewelry. You can start an investment with one gram of gold or silver, your money is much safer invested into precious metals than it is sitting in a bank somewhere.

Most Gold is stored in vaults depending on how much wealth a person has, which will determine the location of the precious metals. Obviously, gold and other precious metals such as silver, palladium, and platinum can also be stored in home/office safes, although ideally they should be stored in vaults. Bullion Vault will store your gold automatically.

With this said it makes me wonder if sanctions of transferring Gold Bullion in and out of Russia will be the next thing on the horizon.

I do not believe imports and export in Russia and Belarus can be stopped entirely. As in the video clip, I shared the other day that Russian lorries were tailgated in Poland on the border of Belarus importing Medicine and Food.

Put it this way if Class A Drugs are being sold on black markets worldwide, how are the producers distributing and supplying something that is illegal? The same should be said with anything that is or could be banned will have a higher street value and will be in more demand with strategies to smuggle especially in lorries.

So yes I do agree with the sanctions but I am curious what will happen to all the seized assets that no one seems to be talking about. Would it not be a good idea to house the Ukrainians coming to the UK, considering everything they have and are still going through? I’m sure that would hit a raw nerve or two for the Oligarchs and P#tin.

13. About Me.

I do not have any political or economic background. However, I do have experience in security considering I used to jointly run a security company with my ex-husband “Alan Richard Barnes” called “Siren Security” in Cardiff from 1993 to 2001 with 32 manned guards as well as undercover covert operations. Alan is sadly no longer with us and passed away in May 2021.

#sanctions #oligarchs #goldbullion #ira #goldandsilver #cryptocurrency #bitcoin #blockchains #ico #nfts #boycottingrussia

Online Censorship



Online censorship is a strategy used by search engines and government agencies to control and suppress published information that can be accessed by members of the public. Online censorship puts restrictions on what information can be put on the internet. Online Censors free speech – (There is no such thing as free speech). Internet censorship limits the content the public can access and potentially the content that gets published by content writers.

How Internet Censorship Affects You (+Pros & Cons) (

Online Censorship

Censorship of Articles, Images, and videos.

I tried publishing an article the other day on “Financial Difficulty” and how this W## is going to affect the global economy and basically I kept getting a 500 server error. I took it up with IT and basically, they could not give me a finite explanation, so I started to do a bit of digging.

It wasn’t until I watched the film on “Amazon Prime Video” and what is happening with the sanctions that I started joining the dots, the film “The Forecaster” made me realize we do not have freedom of speech and everything we say and do we are being watched and controlled.

If the elites of this world have their assets and bank accounts frozen what chances have the rest of us have if we step out of line and perhaps say the wrong thing?

At least these people have fiat money and precious metals that they could still live off to a certain degree.

I think it is about time these greedy men were taught a lesson and by rights and had their assets confiscated and their bank accounts frozen. Now consider this scenario and I am not an economist but would that mean the banks would have more money and interest rates would fall with all this surplus money in circulation?

The sanctions are a way to diffuse the fire by taking away the fuel or the money needed to fund w### and to rightly so!

However, if Shell PLC is buying oil in Rus###, then inadvertently they are fuelling the fire. The same goes for Coke~Cola, Pepsi, and Starbucks, if all these companies are still trading in Russia then they are also fueling the fire.

However, the film did say that Martin Armstrong, once a Wall Street-based financial advisor, was arrested and jailed on charges of orchestrating a 3 billion dollar Ponzi scheme, which he still disputes to this day, but in reality, he was the accuser and then because of what evidence he had, he became the victim, where he was punished for stepping out of line.

I then tried uploading the video that I wanted to share on Financial Difficulty, it was a video that you can view on Youtube, “The Hidden Secrets About Money” by Mike Mahoney, and my article was unresponsive. So if you do want to check this out just do a quick search and I highly recommend it as it tells you what is going on with the world right now with the money system. If you go directly to Mikes’s website you will see and hear for yourself that Mike also experienced censorship of his own articles.

This now tallies what was in the news today that journalists publishing news, not in line with the Russian Dictator’s point of view ake news about his military could face 15 years in jail. I have omitted from publishing his name and I guess you know who I am talking about P####.

Questions I would have asked would have been:

  1. What has Ukraine done to deserve this?
  2. Will you explain yourself to the world and your reasons why you have acted so harshly?
  3. Could you not have resolved any differences or misunderstandings in a civil manner?
  4. What does your family think of what you are doing?
  5. Do you not care about your own family and how it is going to affect them?
  6. Have you not got conscious?
  7. Do you not care about human life?
  8. Why target civilians?
  9. What have civilians ever done wrong for you to punish them?
  10. Do you not care about your own people?
  11. Do you not care about businesses in your own country which are now suffering?
  12. Do you not care about your own economy?
  13. Are you mentally unwell?
  14. Have you been accessed by a psychiatrist?
  15. Do you know you are polluting the air of neighboring countries including your own?
  16. Do you not want world peace?
  17. Do you realize what you do and acquire you can never take it with you when you are gone?
  18. Do you care you are being compared to the WWII dictator?
  19. Will you address all the families that have been affected by what you have done including your own people?
  20. Do you not care you are the most hated man on the planet?
  21. Can you sleep soundly at night?

I was originally going to use this platform as my voice and write him a letter seeing I could not email as his websites have been hacked but thought better of it as you never know who is watching.

It has now emerged that Facebook and Twitter have been ba#### by this country.

If they have nothing to hide they should not be ba####g anything or threatening media outlets and journalists. If they want to suppress what their people can see there will be more social media platforms that will pop up and websites, they cannot b## them all.

Here is a list of words you should use wisely on the internet without being censored or flagged by government agencies.

If you happen to use these words in your articles you may end up having your website penalized and thrown off by algorithms.

Editors Final Words.

I hope P#### sees some sense and puts a stop to this senseless w##.

He has single handily ruined his own country. That is why you should not have men in power as there is too much testosterone flying around and big egos. Women would never go to these lengths to win an argument. Also, the Ukrainian girl with pink hair that died should be the martyr post-child for the face of peace and it should be sent to the k#####n and be put on the dictator’s desk. I could not share the picture because it is copyrighted but here is the link to the news article: Younger brother of pink-haired girl shot dead with her parents in Ukraine has died (


Rob Moore -Disruptive Entrepreneur on his opinion on online censorship.

#onlinecensorship #censorsorship #interenetcensorship #500severerror #penalisedwebsite