Cymru Marketing Journal - (CMJUK) - Online Business Journal & Digital Marketing Agency. Business News, Directory, SEO, Social Media Management, Advertising, Reviews, Forum, Market Research, Content Writing & Website Design. Thinking Local, Acting Global.
Jeremy Hunt’s Push to Reintegrate the Unemployed into the Workforce
The issue of unemployment has been a central concern for governments around the world. In the United Kingdom, former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has taken on the task of addressing this pressing issue by implementing policies aimed at encouraging the unemployed to rejoin the workforce. While Hunt’s efforts have garnered both support and criticism, it is important to examine the motivations behind his approach and its potential impact on individuals and the economy.
The Unemployment Challenge
Unemployment poses significant challenges to both individuals and the economy as a whole. It can lead to financial instability, reduced self-esteem, and social isolation for those without a job. Moreover, high levels of unemployment can strain government resources, increase dependence on welfare programs, and negatively affect economic growth. To combat these issues, Jeremy Hunt has put forward a series of measures aimed at getting people back to work.
The “Back to Work” Initiative
One of Jeremy Hunt’s key initiatives is the “Back to Work” program, which is designed to incentivize the unemployed to seek employment. The program includes a range of measures, such as increased access to job training and education programs, expanded childcare services, and partnerships with businesses to create job opportunities. These measures are intended to address some of the common barriers that keep people out of the workforce.
Critics argue that the “Back to Work” program places too much pressure on the unemployed and does not adequately address the root causes of unemployment, such as a lack of available jobs in certain regions or industries. They argue that the government should focus more on creating economic conditions that encourage job growth rather than simply pushing individuals to find work.
Benefits of Reintegration
Jeremy Hunt’s approach is based on the belief that work is not only a source of income but also a means of personal fulfillment and social connection. By helping the unemployed find work, his policies aim to enhance the well-being of individuals and reduce their reliance on social welfare programs. Moreover, when more people are employed, the overall economy can benefit from increased productivity, higher tax revenues, and reduced government spending on unemployment benefits.
Challenges and Concerns
While Hunt’s efforts are well-intentioned, they do not come without challenges and concerns. Critics worry that some individuals may be forced into jobs that do not align with their skills or aspirations, leading to job dissatisfaction and decreased job retention. Additionally, there are concerns about the quality of jobs available and whether they provide fair wages and job security.
Moreover, there is a need to ensure that the “Back to Work” program is accessible to all, including vulnerable populations such as those with disabilities, single parents, and individuals with mental health issues. Adequate support and accommodations must be in place to help these groups overcome their unique barriers to employment.
List Of Easy Businesses A Person Can Start.
Starting a business can be a rewarding endeavor, and there are many easy and low-cost business ideas that individuals can consider, depending on their interests, skills, and resources. Here are some easy businesses that people can start:
Freelance Services:
Freelance writing
Graphic design
Web development
Social media management
Content creation (e.g., videos, podcasts)
Virtual assistance
Online Retail:
Dropshipping (selling products without holding inventory)
Print-on-demand (custom merchandise like t-shirts and mugs)
Handmade crafts or art on platforms like Etsy
Consulting and Coaching:
Business Consulting
Life Coaching
Fitness Coaching
Nutrition consulting
Career Coaching
Home-Based Services:
House cleaning
Pet sitting or dog walking
Lawn care or gardening
Home organizing and decluttering
Babysitting or childcare
Food and Beverage:
Baking and selling homemade goods
Catering small events
Food delivery or meal prep services
Selling specialty food items (e.g., jams, sauces)
Tutoring and Educational Services:
Private tutoring (academic subjects or test preparation)
Language instruction
Music Lessons
Online course creation (e.g., on platforms like Udemy)
Personal Services:
Event planning and coordination
Photography or videography services
Hairstyling or makeup artistry for special occasions
Mobile car detailing
Personal shopping or fashion consulting
Repair and Maintenance:
Appliance Repair
Bicycle repair
Smartphone or computer repair
Small appliance repair (e.g., sewing machines)
Handyman services
Fitness and Wellness:
Personal training or fitness classes
Yoga or Pilates instruction
Massage therapy
Meditation and mindfulness coaching
Health and wellness coaching
Cleaning and Organizing Products:
Creating and selling natural cleaning products
Organizational tools and products (e.g., storage solutions)
Eco-friendly or sustainable household products
Mobile Services:
Mobile car wash and detailing
Mobile pet grooming
Mobile beauty and spa services
Mobile car repair and maintenance
Digital Products and Services:
Selling e-books or digital guides
Creating and selling printables (e.g., planners, artwork)
Offering online courses or workshops
Providing digital marketing services
Affiliate Marketing
Content Writing
Conclusion
Jeremy Hunt’s push to reintegrate the unemployed into the workforce is a complex and contentious issue. While his “Back to Work” program aims to address the challenges of unemployment and improve individual well-being, it also faces criticism for its potential shortcomings. It is crucial for policymakers to strike a balance between encouraging people to find work and addressing systemic issues such as job availability and quality.
Ultimately, the success of Jeremy Hunt’s initiatives will depend on their ability to create a supportive and inclusive environment that enables the unemployed to transition back into the workforce successfully. It is essential to monitor the outcomes and make adjustments as necessary to ensure that the efforts to reduce unemployment benefit both individuals and the overall economy.
“In fact, there has never been a better time to start your own business and follow your dream”.
“Imagine being your own boss and not being a slave or answer to someone else. Imagine not having to job hunt and create something you are passionate about, whilst helping to boost the economy“
We Will Help You Get Started!
Consult: (free consulting for 12 months based on a 5-hour week £1.000 x 12 months = £12,000).
Website Design & Development: (we will give you a head start and give you free design and development, and free hosting for the first 3 months‘ worth (£49.99 – £120.00 based on a 12-month contract).
Free domain name: (priceless).
Up to 5 free email addresses.
Marketing & Advertising: (free marketing and advertising for 12 months worth £350 per month x 12 months = £4,200.00)
Total Savings Up To:
£16,560.00
While it’s crucial to implement policies and initiatives aimed at encouraging the unemployed to reenter the workforce, it’s also important to recognize that not everyone will be immediately receptive to these efforts. Various factors can contribute to reluctance to work, including personal circumstances, health issues, caregiving responsibilities, or skills gaps. It’s essential to approach the unemployed with empathy and understanding, recognizing that their challenges may require targeted support and solutions. Addressing the underlying reasons for reluctance to work, providing skill development opportunities, and creating an environment that fosters inclusion and growth can go a long way in helping those who are hesitant to take the step back into employment. Ultimately, a holistic and compassionate approach is necessary to ensure that everyone has a fair chance at accessing the benefits and opportunities of gainful employment.
Five Senior Tory Landlords Accused of ‘Blocking’ Renters Reform Bill Named
The issue of housing and renters’ rights has taken center stage. With a growing demand for housing reform, a Renters Reform Bill was proposed to address the concerns of millions of tenants across the UK. However, the bill has faced resistance from some Conservative Party members, specifically five senior Tory landlords who have been accused of obstructing its progress.
The Renters Reform Bill
The Renters Reform Bill is a proposed piece of legislation aimed at addressing various issues faced by renters in the UK. It seeks to improve the rental market by introducing measures such as rent controls, longer tenancies, and increased security for tenants. The bill also aims to abolish Section 21 evictions, which allow landlords to evict tenants without providing a reason, and introduce a lifetime deposit that moves with the tenant from property to property.
Accusations Against Tory Landlords
Five senior members of the Conservative Party, all of whom have been identified as landlords themselves, have come under scrutiny for their alleged role in blocking the Renters Reform Bill. These individuals have been accused of putting their interests ahead of the needs of millions of renters who are struggling with rising rents, insecure tenancies, and inadequate living conditions.
Jacob Rees-Mogg: The prominent MP for North East Somerset and Leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Rees-Mogg, has faced criticism for opposing the Renters Reform Bill. As a landlord himself, Rees-Mogg’s involvement in the decision-making process has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Richard Benyon:Former Minister for Natural Environment and Conservative MP for Newbury, Richard Benyon, is another senior Tory landlord who has been accused of blocking the bill. Benyon owns a significant number of properties and has reportedly lobbied against measures that would limit landlords’ ability to evict tenants easily.
Christopher Chope:The MP for Christchurch, Christopher Chope, has gained notoriety for blocking various bills in the past, including those aimed at improving renters’ rights. Chope has a history of opposing regulations that could affect his interests as a landlord.
Philip Davies: Philip Davies, the MP for Shipley, is known for his stance against housing reform. As a landlord, he has been accused of advocating for policies that favor property owners over renters, such as resisting rent controls and tenant protections.
Bob Blackman: Bob Blackman, the MP for Harrow East, has also faced accusations of opposing renters’ rights legislation. His association with landlord groups and his voting record have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
Impact on Renters
The accusations against these five senior Tory landlords have sparked outrage among renters and housing advocates. Many argue that these MPs should prioritize the interests of their constituents over their personal property interests. The Renters Reform Bill, if passed, could bring about significant changes in the rental market, offering more security and stability to tenants.
The Renters Reform Bill is an important piece of legislation that aims to address the concerns of millions of renters in the UK. However, accusations against five senior Tory landlords have cast a shadow over its progress. The public and renters’ advocates are closely watching the actions of these MPs and urging them to put the needs of their constituents before their personal property interests. In a time when housing affordability and security are critical issues, the role of these individuals in shaping housing policy remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.
Rishi Sunak Told to Axe 90,000 Jobs to Save UK from Economic Disaster: Advisers and Implications
The United Kingdom’s economy has faced unprecedented challenges in recent years, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the nation grapples with a spiraling deficit, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has been advised to make some tough decisions, including cutting 90,000 jobs to stave off a potential economic disaster. This move has sparked significant debate, with questions arising about who advised Sunak and what implications it holds for the future of British politics and government downsizing.
The Economic Conundrum
The pandemic has left a profound impact on the UK economy, with skyrocketing public spending and a drop in revenue. The government has rolled out extensive support packages, including furlough schemes and business grants, to help individuals and companies weather the storm. However, this has come at a substantial cost, pushing the country’s budget deficit to alarming levels. To regain fiscal stability, Rishi Sunak has been advised to consider drastic measures, including reducing the public sector workforce.
Who Advised Rishi Sunak?
While the specifics of the advice provided to Rishi Sunak have not been disclosed in detail, it is known that he consults with a range of economic experts, Treasury officials, and advisors from various fields. The decision to potentially cut 90,000 jobs is not one taken lightly, and it reflects the dire financial situation facing the UK.
Some of the key advisors in the PM circle include:
Treasury Officials: Sunak works closely with the Treasury team, which includes the Chief Secretary to the Treasury and other senior officials. These individuals provide insights and recommendations on fiscal policies and economic recovery strategies.
Economists and Financial Experts: The PM seeks advice from renowned economists and financial experts, who provide data-driven insights into the economic health of the nation. They also help formulate long-term strategies to mitigate economic risks.
Business Leaders: Sunak engages with leaders from various industries to gauge the impact of government policies on the private sector. Their input is invaluable in shaping economic recovery plans that support businesses and job creation.
Political Advisors: As a member of the Conservative Party, Rishi Sunak also consults with political advisors within his party to ensure that his decisions align with the government’s overall agenda.
Implications for Politicians and Government Downsizing
The prospect of cutting 90,000 jobs raises concerns about the role of politicians and the size of the government. While these job cuts are aimed at reducing the budget deficit, they do not necessarily represent a broader trend toward downsizing the government. Instead, they highlight the need for prudent financial management during extraordinary circumstances.
Fiscal Responsibility: The move underscores the importance of fiscal responsibility in times of crisis. Governments must make tough decisions to balance budgets and ensure that public finances are sustainable in the long term.
Targeted Cuts: Sunak’s decision to cut jobs should be seen as a targeted measure to address the immediate economic crisis. It does not necessarily signal a broader shift toward smaller government, as the government plays a vital role in providing essential services and supporting the welfare of citizens.
Balancing Act: Politicians must strike a delicate balance between managing budgets, providing public services, and stimulating economic growth. Sunak’s advisors likely stress the importance of finding this equilibrium.
Public Perception: The government’s approach to handling these job cuts will undoubtedly influence public perception and political dynamics. Leaders must communicate the rationale behind such decisions and demonstrate their commitment to the welfare of the nation.
100,000 New Roles and Soaring Costs
In just seven years, the United Kingdom’s civil service has experienced a significant expansion, with more than 100,000 new roles created. This expansion, often referred to as “The Blob” by some commentators, has raised concerns about the size and cost of the government workforce. As of 2023, the civil service has grown by a staggering 24 percent, and the overall pay bill for government workers has surged from £9.7 billion in 2010 to a whopping £15.5 billion. Additionally, the public sector pensions bill reached a staggering £116.7 billion in 2021, according to The Sun. These figures beg the question: Is the civil service becoming unsustainable?
The Bloated Civil Service
The term “The Blob” has been used by critics to describe the expanding civil service, which has been growing steadily over the past seven years. While the reasons for this growth are complex, it is clear that the government has been hiring at a rapid pace. The civil service, responsible for implementing government policies and delivering public services, plays a crucial role in the functioning of the country. However, concerns have arisen about the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of such an expansion.
The Rising Costs
One of the most significant concerns surrounding the growth of “The Blob” is the rising cost to taxpayers. The overall pay bill for government workers has increased substantially, from £9.7 billion in 2010 to a staggering £15.5 billion in 2023. This represents a substantial financial burden on the UK’s public finances, especially as the government grapples with the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Public Sector Pensions
In addition to the soaring pay bill, the public sector pensions bill has also reached alarming heights. In 2021, it stood at £116.7 billion, a figure that raises questions about the long-term sustainability of these pension schemes. While public sector employees certainly deserve fair and secure retirement benefits, the rapid increase in pension costs must be carefully managed to avoid placing undue pressure on the national budget.
Balancing Act
Balancing the need for an effective civil service with the necessity of fiscal responsibility is a challenging task for any government. On one hand, a well-functioning civil service is essential for delivering vital public services and implementing government policies. On the other hand, unchecked growth and escalating costs can strain public finances and lead to concerns about government efficiency.
Conclusion
The advice given to Rishi Sunak to consider cutting 90,000 jobs to salvage the UK’s economy showcases the complexities and challenges of managing public finances during a crisis. While the decision raises questions about government downsizing, it primarily underscores the need for responsible fiscal management and the importance of listening to a diverse group of advisors from various fields. The path ahead for the UK will require difficult choices, and how these decisions are implemented and communicated will be crucial in shaping the country’s economic recovery and political landscape.
The significant expansion of the civil service in just seven years, along with the accompanying increase in the pay bill and pension costs, raises legitimate questions about sustainability and efficiency. While the government has a responsibility to provide essential services and support its workforce, it must also exercise prudent financial management to ensure that taxpayer funds are used wisely. The challenge for policymakers is to strike the right balance between maintaining an effective civil service and controlling costs to ensure the long-term fiscal health of the nation. As “The Blob” continues to grow, it is essential to monitor its impact and make informed decisions to safeguard the UK’s financial stability.
Gold-plated, inflation-proof pensions have become a topic of significant debate in many countries, including the UK, where approximately six million state workers benefit from such pension schemes. These pensions offer a level of financial security and stability, guaranteeing retirees a reliable income that adjusts for inflation. While they provide an attractive incentive for public sector employees, concerns about the long-term sustainability and cost to taxpayers have led to ongoing discussions about pension reform in the public sector. Balancing the needs of retirees with the fiscal responsibilities of the government remains a complex challenge.
Local Housing Allowance (LHA) is a Major Cause of Homelessness & Suicide
** Disclaimer**
This article is sensitive, caution is advised because the wording ‘Suicide’ & ‘Homelessness’ is mentioned more than once. We have linked suicide help and support links towards the end of this article. If you are in distress you must contact emergency services or go to A&E or ER.
Content:
Understanding Local Housing Allowance (LHA)
The impact on families
Addressing the issue
Why is local housing not in line with the current rates of inflation
Impact on Mental Health & Rise of Suicide?
Rent Increases
Renter Reform Bill
Shelter Recommendations
Final Notes
Health & Wellbeing Useful Links
Homelessness charity Shelter identified the previous LHA freeze until March 2023 as a major cause of more families facing homelessness.
Homelessness is a pressing issue that affects communities worldwide, and families are often among the most vulnerable demographic. In recent years, the role of housing policies in exacerbating family homelessness has come under scrutiny. One significant factor contributing to this crisis is the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) system. While designed to provide financial support to low-income households, the LHA has inadvertently become a major cause of families facing homelessness.
Understanding Local Housing Allowance (LHA)
The Local Housing Allowance is a system used in some countries, including the United Kingdom, to determine the amount of housing benefit or housing support a low-income household is entitled to. Rather than basing this support on actual rent prices, the LHA sets a maximum limit based on local market rents. This fixed cap often fails to reflect the actual cost of housing in high-demand areas, leading to a mismatch between the support provided and the real cost of renting a home.
The Impact on Families
While the intention behind LHA is to offer a safety net for families in need, it frequently falls short due to several key reasons:
1. Soaring Rental Costs: In areas where the demand for housing is high, rental costs can quickly surpass the LHA cap. Families are then forced to choose between spending a significant portion of their income on rent or seeking more affordable housing options, which are often located far from schools, jobs, and essential services.
2. Limited Availability: Affordable rental properties within the LHA cap are often scarce, leaving families with fewer choices. The competition for these properties drives up demand, which can lead to landlords being selective in their choice of tenants, disadvantaging families with low incomes or rental histories that are not ideal.
3. Unpredictable Rent Increases: Even when a family secures housing within the LHA cap, there’s no guarantee that their situation will remain stable. Landlords can raise rents over time, and if these increases exceed the LHA cap, families find themselves struggling to cover the shortfall.
4. Eviction Risk: Families unable to meet their rental obligations due to the gap between LHA and actual rents are at a high risk of eviction. This instability can be especially damaging for children, disrupting their education, social connections, and overall well-being.
5. Increased Reliance on Temporary Accommodation: The failure of LHA to cover housing costs often results in families being placed in temporary accommodation, such as homeless shelters or emergency housing. These arrangements are meant to be short-term solutions but can become prolonged due to the difficulty of finding suitable, affordable housing.
Addressing the Issue
To tackle the issue of family homelessness exacerbated by the Local Housing Allowance system, comprehensive reforms are necessary:
LHA Adjustment: Regularly update the LHA cap to reflect current market rents accurately. This could be based on real-time data rather than relying on periodic adjustments that might lag changing market conditions.
Targeted Support: Implement measures that specifically address the needs of families. This could include allocating additional funds for families with children to cover the higher costs associated with raising a family.
Preventative Strategies: Invest in preventative measures, such as mediation services to help families at risk of eviction negotiate with landlords or programs that provide financial counseling to help families manage their housing costs.
Affordable Housing Initiatives: Increase the availability of genuinely affordable housing units in high-demand areas. This could involve collaborations between government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private developers.
Tenant Rights and Protections: Strengthen tenant rights to ensure families are not unfairly evicted due to rental increases beyond their control.
So why is the government not doing anything about it and why are more and more people developing mental health issues or their mental health deteriorating due to the direct strain of housing and financial difficulties because of greedy landlords and bureaucratic red tape?
Why is local housing not in line with the current rates of inflation and the impact on Mental Health & Suicide?
The Stagnant Local Housing Allowance: A Challenge in the Face of Inflation and Rising Rents
In recent years, the issue of affordable housing has gained significant attention as rental prices continue to climb, making it increasingly difficult for individuals and families to secure suitable accommodation. One crucial lifeline for those struggling to cover housing costs is the local housing allowance (LHA), a welfare payment designed to aid low-income households in affording rental accommodations. However, a growing concern has emerged as local councils have failed to increase the LHA in tandem with the rate of inflation and the surge in rents imposed by landlords.
The local housing allowance is a vital support mechanism that ensures vulnerable individuals and families have access to safe and adequate housing. Its purpose is to bridge the gap between what people can afford and the ever-increasing cost of rental properties. Ideally, the LHA should be adjusted annually to reflect changes in the economy, including inflation and fluctuations in rental prices. However, the reality paints a different picture, with many local councils neglecting to make necessary adjustments.
Several factors contribute to this discrepancy between rising rents and stagnant local housing allowances. One key challenge is the broader economic landscape, which affects the financial resources available to local councils. Budget constraints and competing priorities often force councils to make difficult decisions about where to allocate funds. Unfortunately, the LHA might not always be at the forefront of these discussions, leaving it underfunded and out of touch with the real cost of living.
Furthermore, the dynamics between landlords and tenants play a role in this issue. Landlords, motivated by market demand and seeking higher profits, can raise rents as they see fit. When the local housing allowance fails to keep pace with these increases, it puts vulnerable tenants in an incredibly precarious position. They are left struggling to cover the widening gap between their housing allowance and the actual rental costs, often facing the threat of eviction or homelessness.
The lack of alignment between the local housing allowance and the rising cost of living also has broader societal implications. Families forced to spend an increasing portion of their income on housing may have less money available for other essentials like food, education, healthcare, and transportation. This financial strain can lead to a cycle of poverty, impacting the overall well-being of individuals and communities.
To address this pressing issue, a collaborative effort is required on multiple fronts. Local councils must prioritize the regular review and adjustment of the local housing allowance to ensure it remains relevant to the current economic landscape. Advocacy groups, nonprofits, and social welfare organizations can play a crucial role in raising awareness about the impact of inadequate housing support and putting pressure on policymakers to take action.
Moreover, creating policies that incentivize affordable housing development can help alleviate the pressure on the rental market. This might involve working with landlords to encourage reasonable rent increases, as well as investing in the construction of affordable housing units.
The disparity between the local housing allowance and the rising cost of renting presents a critical challenge for low-income households. To mitigate the effects of this issue, local councils, policymakers, and community stakeholders must collaborate to ensure that the LHA is regularly adjusted to reflect inflation and changes in the rental market. Only through proactive measures can we safeguard the well-being of vulnerable individuals and families, providing them with the opportunity to access safe and stable housing without sacrificing other essential needs.
Impact on Mental Health & Rise of Suicide
An estimated 741 deaths of homeless people in England and Wales were registered in 2021, with a 95% confidence interval of 658 to 824 estimated deaths.
The NHS is already under a lot of strain. Councils and Landlords are causing mental health issues due to increasing rents exponentially.
The NHS is facing a lot of strain because of the influx of mental health disorders due to the cost of living price rises. A report by the NHS Confederation says that mental health services are struggling to meet the demand for support caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis, which can lead to stress, anxiety, isolation, and low mood. Another report by NHS Providers says that 8 million people in England cannot get specialist help because they are not sick enough to qualify and that the mental health budget needs to increase by at least £2.85bn from next year. The Guardian also reports that the number of patients who have received hospital treatment for mood disorders in England has decreased by a third in five years, due to a shortage of mental health beds. The BMA also highlights that the NHS has been facing years of inadequate planning and chronic under-resourcing, which affects its ability to cope with the pressures.
The Silent Crisis: Mental Health and Suicide Surge Linked to Inadequate Local Housing Allowance
A quiet crisis has been brewing beneath the surface of society, one that is directly tied to the skyrocketing cost of living and the failure of local housing allowances to keep pace with inflation. The harrowing consequences of this issue are becoming increasingly evident, as mental health struggles and suicide rates surge among vulnerable populations who find themselves trapped in a cycle of financial instability and housing insecurity. Alcohol Abuse is on the rise: Alcoholism Symptoms And Warning Signs – Addiction Center
The local housing allowance, a crucial component of the social safety net, was designed to provide a lifeline for low-income individuals and families, ensuring that they have access to affordable housing. However, as the cost of living continues to rise and the gap widens between rental prices and the allowance provided, a growing number of people are finding themselves in untenable situations.
The Cost of Living Crisis: A Ticking Time Bomb for Mental Health
With inflation outpacing the adjustments made to local housing allowances, many individuals relying on these benefits are struggling to make ends meet. The cost of rent, utilities, and basic necessities now often exceeds the financial support they receive, forcing them to choose between paying the bills and putting food on the table. This financial strain is a breeding ground for stress, anxiety, and depression, which can have devastating effects on mental health.
As families are rendered homeless due to the lack of affordable options, feelings of hopelessness and despair escalate. The toll on mental well-being is exacerbated by the sense of helplessness in the face of a seemingly unbreakable cycle of poverty and housing instability.
Rising Suicide Rates: A Disturbing Consequence
Tragically, the inadequacy of local housing allowances and the rise in living costs are not just affecting mental health—they’re also contributing to a surge in suicide rates. The strain of financial hardship, coupled with the emotional toll of housing instability, can push individuals to their breaking point. The feeling of being trapped with no way out can lead to a sense of desperation that is difficult to comprehend for those who haven’t experienced it firsthand.
Researchers and mental health professionals are sounding the alarm about this alarming trend. The connection between economic hardship and mental health struggles, including suicidal ideation, is well-documented. The inability to secure stable, safe housing amplifies these challenges, creating a deeply concerning feedback loop.
A Call to Action
Addressing this crisis requires a multi-faceted approach. First and foremost, there is an urgent need to reevaluate and adjust local housing allowances to be in line with the real costs of living. A dynamic system that takes into account regional variations and inflation rates is essential to ensure that vulnerable individuals and families are adequately supported.
Furthermore, investment in mental health support services is paramount. Providing accessible counseling, therapy, and crisis intervention resources can be a lifeline for those facing the darkest moments of their lives. Financial education and job training programs can also help empower individuals to break free from the cycle of poverty and instability.
The rise of mental health struggles and suicide rates due to the inadequacy of local housing allowances is a pressing issue that demands immediate attention. As a society, we must recognize the intertwined nature of housing, economics, and mental health, and take decisive action to provide relief to those who are suffering. Only through collaborative efforts can we hope to reverse this distressing trend and create a brighter, more stable future for all.
Such landlords will be made to reimburse the difference of the government guidelines if found guilty. A tenant should dispute their rent with the landlord or agency first before taking further action.
Fewer properties are becoming unavailable to those on low incomes. As a result, households are struggling to pay their housing costs exacerbating the cost of living crisis with many having to go without meals to pay their bills.
Renter Reform Bill
Tenants should be protected from no-fault evictions and according to Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, said: “The government is failing renters by stalling on the Renters Reform Bill. For each day that MPs are off on their six-week summer break, another 172 families will be hit with a no-fault eviction notice – giving them just two months to pack up and leave their homes”.
Local Housing Allowance (LHA) should be restored to cover at least the cheapest 30% (i.e. bottom third) of local rents. The government should make this a priority measure for tackling the cost of living crisis to avoid a wave of homelessness.
LHA rates should be re-linked to the cost of renting in future years to keep them in line with at least the 30th percentile as the private rental market fluctuates.
The household benefit cap must be abolished or, at the least, its level should be urgently reviewed before the end of 2022 as recommended by the Work and Pensions Select Committee.
The data used to determine LHA should be reviewed, particularly regarding whether The current determination of the 30th percentile is an accurate reflection of the cost of modest homes.
In the longer term, there must be investment in a new generation of social housing, with rents pegged to local income. This is the only truly affordable tenure and is the key to insulating households from future price shocks.
Family homelessness is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including housing policies like the Local Housing Allowance. While the LHA system was designed to provide support to low-income families, its limitations have led to unintended consequences, leaving families vulnerable to homelessness. By reevaluating and reforming the LHA system and implementing supportive policies, societies can work toward ensuring that families have a stable and secure place to call home, fostering healthier communities and brighter futures for all.
According to a Government spokespersonsaid: “We are determined to prevent homelessness before it occurs. Temporary accommodation ensures no family is without a roof over their head, but we have been clear that the use of B&Bs should always be a last resort. “We have given £2 billion over three years to help local authorities tackle homelessness and rough sleeping, targeted to areas where it is needed most. “We are set to spend over £30 billion on housing support this year, on top of significant cost-of-living help worth around £3,300 per household. We’ve also maintained our £1 billion boost to Local Housing Allowance, while our discretionary housing payments provide a safety net for anyone struggling to meet their rent or housing costs.”
Starving Families
It begs the question of how many people including children are starving behind closed doors just so that parents keep a roof over their heads and what is the result for many who suffer mental health issues or whose mental health deteriorates due to the rise of the cost of living, where in many cases is non reversible. According to the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), 4.2 million children were living in poverty in the UK in 2021/2022. That is one in three children. Around 350,000 more children were pushed into poverty last year.
Unless you have a high-paid job, low-income families or people living alone are unable to survive on one income. For people who have partners, there are in most cases two incomes, but for the person living alone, it is much harder to make ends meet. People who are employed have a guaranteed income whilst self-employed people don’t.
Vulnerable People With Mental health Disabilities
People with mental health disabilities are more susceptible to having their disorders worsen from mounting financial pressure.
Remember wherever there is a problem there is a solution and you should never give up the fight. There are many useful resources not only on our sites but also by simply searching.
It may sound easy to say and give advice, but believe me, I am an advocate for mental health and know firsthand how hard it is when you are faced with depression, hence I document my health online as a form of self-help therapy.
If you feel you have no support try reaching out to some of the organizations listed below and if you feel life is unbearable and you cannot cope call emergency services or visit A&E or ER.
If you have suicidal thoughts, talk to someone about them. If you do not have any friends or family reach out to the Samaritans on 116 123 For Free. Sometimes talking to a stranger can help you put things into perspective and help you tackle daily challenges. Arrange an appointment with your local doctor and explain how you are feeling. Do not drink alcohol or take recreational drugs as this may make the matter worse. Seek professional help ASAP.
Renters Reform Bill – Ensuring Fairness, Stability, and Security for Renters
Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, said: “The government is failing renters by stalling on the Renters Reform Bill. For each day that MPs are off on their six-week summer break, another 172 families will be hit with a no-fault eviction notice – giving them just two months to pack up and leave their homes.
What is in this article:
Renters Reform Bill
Understanding Section 21 No-Fault Evictions
The Need for Reform
Introducing Open-Ended Tenancies
Promoting Fairness and Equity
Addressing Landlord Concerns
Statistics On Homelessness In The UK
The Scale of Homelessness
Rough Sleeping and Street Homelessness
Hidden Homelessness and Temporary Accommodation
Causes of Homelessness
Impact on Vulnerable Groups
Government Initiatives and Challenges
Landlord Rent Increases
Understanding Landlord Rent Increases: Causes, Consequences, and Tenant Rights
Why Do Landlords Implement Rent Increases?
Consequences for Tenants
Tenant Rights in Rent Increase Situations
Tenant Action and Communication
Tenants who receive a rent increase should this
Landlords Causing Renters Financial Difficulty
Landlords Responsibilities
The Responsibilities of Landlords to Address Mold in the Home
How Much Does Mold Removal Cost
Government Rent Cap
What is the Government Rent Cap?
The Objectives of Rent Caps
The Pros of Rent Caps
The Cons of Rent Caps
Landlords Causing Emotional Distress
The Landlord-Tenant Relationship
Common Causes of Emotional Distress
Impact on Tenants’ Well-being
Seeking Solutions For Preparation of Litigation For Emotional Distress
How To Report Rogue Landlords
Electrical Safety Inspections
Landlord Responsibilities for Electrical Safety Inspections
Fire Extinguishers Maintenance
Should It Be The Responsibility of the Tenant To Tell The Electrical Safety Inspectors To Do Their Jobs Properly
Government Database Of Rogue Landlords
Conclusion
Further Reading
Renters Reform Bill
As the housing market evolves and the number of renters increases, it has become crucial for governments to address the challenges tenants face and ensure that they are protected from arbitrary and unjust evictions. In response to growing concerns over the insecurity and vulnerability of renters, the Renters Reform Bill has been introduced to abolish Section 21 no-fault eviction notices. This bill represents a significant step towards ensuring fairness, stability, and security for millions of tenants across the country.
Understanding Section 21 No-Fault Evictions
Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 in the United Kingdom has been a contentious provision that allows landlords to evict their tenants without providing any specific reason or fault on the part of the tenant. This means that renters can be asked to leave their homes at the end of their tenancy agreement or during the periodic tenancy with just a two-month notice, leaving them in a state of uncertainty and upheaval.
Over the years, this practice has led to numerous instances of abuse by unscrupulous landlords who have taken advantage of Section 21 to force tenants out of their properties without proper justification. Many tenants have reported facing retaliatory evictions after requesting necessary repairs or asserting their rights. This has created a climate of fear among renters, often preventing them from asserting their rights or seeking better living conditions.
The Need for Reform
The Renters Reform Bill seeks to rectify these issues and introduce measures that will provide greater security and stability for renters. One of the primary objectives of the bill is to abolish Section 21 no-fault eviction notices, effectively ending the practice of landlords evicting tenants without reason. This reform will significantly empower tenants and allow them to enjoy their right to a safe and secure home without the constant threat of eviction.
Additionally, the bill aims to strengthen the grounds for eviction under Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988. This provision requires landlords to provide valid reasons for evicting tenants, such as rent arrears, property damage, or breach of tenancy agreements. By bolstering the grounds for eviction, the Renters Reform Bill strikes a balance between protecting tenants and acknowledging the legitimate concerns of landlords.
Introducing Open-Ended Tenancies
Another vital aspect of the Renters Reform Bill is the introduction of open-ended tenancies. Under the current system, many tenancy agreements typically run for six or twelve months, leading to frequent relocations for renters who may desire more stability and continuity in their living arrangements. Open-ended tenancies will grant tenants greater flexibility and reduce the need for frequent relocations, promoting stronger and more sustainable communities.
Promoting Fairness and Equity
By abolishing Section 21 and introducing open-ended tenancies, the Renters Reform Bill fosters fairness and equity in the rental market. It ensures that tenants are not at the mercy of landlords who may use no-fault evictions to exploit their power and control over housing. Instead, it establishes a more balanced and respectful relationship between tenants and landlords, promoting trust and cooperation.
Addressing Landlord Concerns
While the Renters Reform Bill focuses on safeguarding tenant rights, it also addresses legitimate concerns raised by landlords. The bill will expedite the process of regaining possession of properties when tenants engage in anti-social behavior or causing significant disruptions to their communities. This provision strikes a balance between protecting tenant rights and ensuring that landlords can address genuine problems promptly.
Statistics On Homelessness In The UK
Homelessness is a pressing social issue that affects millions of people worldwide. In the United Kingdom, homelessness remains a significant challenge, impacting individuals and families across the country. Despite efforts from the government, non-profit organizations, and communities, the problem persists, leaving a devastating impact on those affected.
The Scale of Homelessness: As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, homelessness in the UK has been on the rise for several years. The official figures from the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government (MHCLG) revealed that in 2020, approximately 268,000 people experienced homelessness in England alone. This figure included individuals living on the streets, in temporary accommodation, or inadequate living conditions. The numbers in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland also added significantly to the overall count.
Rough Sleeping and Street Homelessness: Rough sleeping is one of the most visible forms of homelessness, with individuals forced to sleep on the streets, in parks, or other public spaces. The numbers for rough sleeping have witnessed a disturbing increase in recent years. In 2020, it was estimated that over 4,000 people were sleeping rough on any given night across England. The situation has been particularly acute in urban areas, such as London, Manchester, and Birmingham.
Hidden Homelessness and Temporary Accommodation: While rough sleeping is the most apparent form of homelessness, many more individuals are considered “hidden homeless.” These people may be sofa-surfing, staying with friends or family, or living in overcrowded and unsuitable conditions due to the lack of stable housing. This hidden homelessness can be harder to quantify, but it poses significant challenges for those affected. Moreover, the number of families living in temporary accommodation has also seen a worrying increase. In the second quarter of 2020, around 93,000 households were living in temporary housing, including bed and breakfasts and hostels. These conditions can be especially detrimental to children’s well-being and development.
Causes of Homelessness: Homelessness is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. Some of the primary causes include (a) Economic Factors: High housing costs and a shortage of affordable housing have put immense strain on low-income households, pushing them towards homelessness. Greedy Landlords think they can print money without taking into consideration a person’s financial circumstances.(b) Unemployment: Job loss or inadequate income can lead to financial instability, making it challenging to afford housing. (c)Mental Health Issues and Substance Abuse: Individuals with mental health challenges or substance abuse problems may face difficulties in maintaining stable housing. (Some mental and health issues are the direct consequence of a landlord’s actions). (d)Relationship Breakdown: Family disputes, domestic violence, and breakdowns in relationships can result in individuals losing their homes.
Impact on Vulnerable Groups: Homelessness disproportionately affects certain vulnerable groups, such as young people leaving care, ex-offenders, veterans, and LGBTQ+ individuals. Additionally, those with physical disabilities or chronic health conditions face unique challenges in accessing suitable housing and support.
Government Initiatives and Challenges: The UK government and local authorities have implemented various initiatives to combat homelessness. These include funding for support services, prevention programs, and building affordable housing. However, challenges persist, such as bureaucratic barriers, lack of coordination between agencies, and budget constraints.
Landlord Rent Increases
Understanding Landlord Rent Increases: Causes, Consequences, and Tenant Rights
As the cost of living continues to rise, one of the major concerns for many renters is the possibility of facing a rent increase from their landlords. Rent increases are not uncommon, and they can significantly impact a tenant’s financial stability and housing security.
Why Do Landlords Implement Rent Increases?
Landlords may decide to increase rents for various reasons, many of which are influenced by economic factors. Some of the common reasons for rent increases include:
Inflation: When the overall cost of living increases due to inflation, landlords may raise rents to keep up with the rising expenses they incur for maintenance, repairs, and property taxes.
Market Demand: In areas where the demand for rental properties is high and the supply is low, landlords may increase rents to take advantage of the competitive rental market.
Maintenance and Improvements: If landlords have invested in property upgrades, renovations, or significant maintenance work, they might pass these costs onto tenants through rent increases.
Property Taxes: When property taxes increase, landlords may raise rents to offset the additional financial burden.
Operating Costs: Rising utility costs, insurance premiums, and other operating expenses can prompt landlords to raise rents to maintain their profit margins.
Consequences for Tenants
For tenants, rent increases can lead to several significant consequences:
Financial Strain:A sudden rent increase can strain a tenant’s budget, leaving them with less disposable income for other essential expenses like food, transportation, and healthcare.
Housing Insecurity:For tenants living on a fixed income, a substantial rent increase may make it difficult to afford their current residence, forcing them to consider moving to a more affordable place or even facing potential homelessness.
Displacement:Rent hikes can lead to forced displacement, as some tenants may be unable to pay the increased rent and subsequently face eviction.
Reduced Savings and Investment Opportunities:When a significant portion of a tenant’s income is dedicated to rent, it leaves them with limited financial capacity to save for the future or invest in personal growth.
Emotional Stress:The uncertainty and anxiety caused by rent increases can affect a tenant’s mental well-being and stability.
Tenant Rights in Rent Increase Situations
In many jurisdictions, there are laws and regulations in place to protect tenants from arbitrary or excessive rent increases. While the specifics vary depending on location, some common tenant rights include:
Notice Periods: Landlords typically need to provide tenants with advance notice of a rent increase. The length of the notice period varies by jurisdiction but often ranges from 30 to 90 days.
Limitations on Frequency and Amount: Some areas impose restrictions on how often landlords can increase rent and may cap the maximum percentage by which they can raise it.
Rent Control and Stabilization: Certain cities or regions have rent control or rent stabilization measures in place to prevent steep and sudden rent increases, especially in areas facing housing affordability crises.
Protection Against Retaliation: It’s essential to know that landlords cannot increase the rent as retaliation for a tenant exercising their legal rights, such as filing a complaint about the property’s condition or reporting housing code violations.
Lease Agreements: If you have a fixed-term lease agreement, your landlord generally cannot raise the rent until the lease expires, unless there is a specific clause allowing for mid-lease increases.
Tenant Action and Communication
Tenants who receive a rent increase should this:
Review the Lease Agreement: Understand the terms of your lease and any provisions related to rent increases.
Check Local Laws: Research tenant rights and rent control regulations in your area to determine if the proposed increase is within legal bounds.
Communicate with the Landlord: Engage in open and respectful communication with your landlord to understand the reasons for the increase and explore potential alternatives or negotiations.
Seek Legal Advice: If you believe the rent increase is unfair or unlawful, consider consulting with a lawyer or local tenant advocacy group to understand your rights and options.
Landlords Causing Renters Financial Difficulty
The relationship between landlords and renters is essential in ensuring the stability and well-being of both parties. However, in recent times, a concerning trend has emerged where some landlords have been exacerbating financial difficulties for their tenants. While not representative of all landlords, this issue highlights the importance of responsible and compassionate property management.
Unreasonable Rent Hikes: One of the most common ways landlords contribute to financial difficulty for renters is through arbitrary and significant rent increases. For some tenants, a sudden hike in rent can lead to unanticipated financial stress, making it difficult to meet other financial obligations or build savings. Without proper justifications and clear communication, such actions can seem exploitative and lead to resentment, creating an unhealthy living situation.
Neglecting Maintenance and Repairs: Neglecting property maintenance and repairs can also have severe financial consequences for tenants. When landlords fail to address issues such as leaky roofs, faulty plumbing, or inadequate heating and cooling systems, renters may face additional expenses in repairing these problems themselves. In some cases, these repairs can be costly, causing significant financial burdens for individuals who may already be living on tight budgets.
Withholding Security Deposits Unfairly: Security deposits are meant to protect landlords from potential damages caused by tenants, but in some cases, they have been unjustly withheld or used as leverage by landlords. When tenants are not provided with a clear explanation for the deduction of their security deposit or when funds are withheld without valid reasons, it can create an unnecessary financial strain for renters who were expecting to recover their deposit to support their next move.
Discriminatory Practices: Discriminatory practices in rental housing can disproportionately affect certain groups of people, leading to financial hardships. Instances of racial, gender, or other forms of discrimination can limit access to housing opportunities, forcing tenants to pay more for subpar accommodations or settle for housing that may not be suitable for their needs. This results in compromised financial stability and potential long-term implications for the affected individuals and families.
Exorbitant Fees and Charges: Some landlords impose unreasonable fees and charges on tenants, which can quickly add up and contribute to financial distress. These fees may include non-refundable application fees, excessive late payment penalties, and service charges that are not justified by the services rendered. For renters already facing financial difficulties, such extra costs can be crippling and hinder their ability to cover essential expenses.
Landlords Responsibilities
Landlord’s Responsibilities: Ensuring a Harmonious Tenancy
The relationship between landlords and tenants is fundamental to the functioning of the rental housing market. Landlords play a crucial role in providing safe and habitable accommodations for individuals and families seeking a place to call home. However, this responsibility comes with legal and ethical obligations that every landlord must uphold to maintain a harmonious tenancy.
Providing Safe and Habitable Accommodations: Perhaps the most fundamental responsibility of a landlord is to provide safe and habitable accommodations for their tenants. This means that the property should meet basic health and safety standards, with functioning utilities and structural integrity. The property should also be free from any hazards that could pose a risk to the tenants’ well-being. Essential amenities like heating, water, and electricity should be in good working order, and necessary repairs should be promptly addressed.
Complying with Local Laws and Regulations: Landlords must adhere to all relevant local, state, and federal laws and regulations governing rental properties. This includes laws related to housing, safety codes, anti-discrimination laws, and building permits. Familiarity with these regulations is vital to ensure that the property is compliant and that the rights of tenants are protected.
Maintaining the Property: Proper property maintenance is essential to ensure a positive living experience for tenants. Landlords should address maintenance requests promptly and conduct regular inspections to identify and rectify any issues that may arise. Neglecting maintenance can not only lead to tenant dissatisfaction but may also result in more extensive and expensive repairs down the line.
Handling Security Deposits: When tenants pay a security deposit, the landlord holds this amount to cover any damages beyond normal wear and tear. Landlords should clearly outline the terms and conditions regarding the security deposit, including how and when it will be returned after the lease ends. Communication with tenants regarding deductions from the security deposit is crucial to avoid disputes.
Respecting Tenant Privacy: While landlords have the right to access the property for necessary reasons, they must also respect their tenants’ privacy. Laws vary by jurisdiction, but in most cases, landlords must provide reasonable notice before entering the rental unit, except in emergencies or specific circumstances allowed by law.
Dealing with Tenant Concerns and Disputes: Open communication is essential in the landlord-tenant relationship. Landlords should be responsive to their tenants’ concerns and address disputes in a fair and respectful manner. This includes resolving issues related to maintenance, rent payment, or disagreements between neighbors.
Fair and Non-Discriminatory Practices: Landlords must abide by fair housing laws, which prohibit discrimination against prospective tenants based on factors such as race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and familial status. Ensuring an equal opportunity for all applicants and treating tenants without bias is crucial to maintaining ethical and legal rental practices.
Properly Managing Finances: Landlords are responsible for managing the financial aspects of the rental property, including rent collection, bookkeeping, and tax obligations. Keeping accurate records is not only beneficial for the landlord but also ensures transparency and accountability in financial dealings with tenants.
The Responsibilities of Landlords to Address Mold in the Home
Mold is a common household issue that can have serious implications on the health and well-being of tenants. As a landlord, it is crucial to understand and fulfill your responsibilities in addressing mold problems promptly and effectively.
Mold removal should be executed by a professional tradesperson.
Providing a Safe and Habitable Environment: One of the fundamental responsibilities of landlords is to provide tenants with a safe and habitable living environment. Mold growth can lead to various health problems, especially for individuals with allergies, asthma, or other respiratory conditions. As such, landlords must take all necessary steps to prevent mold issues and address any existing problems.
Regular Property Inspections: Landlords should conduct regular property inspections to identify and address potential mold issues promptly. These inspections can help catch mold growth in its early stages, preventing it from spreading and becoming a more significant problem. (Regular inspections are only to be used to monitor the progress of mold elimination or other faults and not an excuse to intrude on a tenant).
Responding to Tenant Complaints: Tenants have the right to report any suspected mold growth or water damage to their landlord. When a tenant notifies the landlord about mold in the home, it is essential to respond quickly and take appropriate action. Ignoring or dismissing tenant complaints about mold can lead to legal disputes and damage the landlord-tenant relationship.
Identifying the Source of Moisture: Mold requires moisture to grow, so identifying and addressing the source of water intrusion or dampness is crucial in preventing mold infestations. Common causes of moisture include leaky roofs, plumbing issues, poor ventilation, and condensation. Landlords must address these problems promptly and effectively to eliminate the conditions that support mold growth.
Repairing Structural Issues: In some cases, mold growth may be a result of structural issues in the property, such as leaks in the walls or foundation. Landlords must address these underlying problems to prevent recurring mold issues and maintain the property’s integrity.
Educating Tenants: Landlords can play a proactive role in mold prevention by educating tenants about how to prevent mold growth and what steps to take if they suspect mold in the home. Simple measures like proper ventilation, using exhaust fans in bathrooms and kitchens, and promptly reporting leaks or water damage can go a long way in preventing mold.
Implementing Preventative Measures: Apart from addressing existing mold problems, landlords should take preventative measures to reduce the likelihood of mold growth in the future. This may include regular maintenance of the property’s HVAC system, ensuring adequate insulation, and installing dehumidifiers in high-moisture areas.
As housing costs continue to soar, affordable housing has become an urgent concern for governments worldwide. In response to this ongoing housing crisis, some governments have implemented rent control policies to alleviate the burden on renters. One such measure is the Government Rent Cap, an intervention designed to limit the amount landlords can charge for rental properties.
The Government Rent Cap is a regulatory measure imposed by the government to control the rate at which landlords can increase rents for residential properties. It aims to strike a balance between protecting tenants from exorbitant rent hikes and ensuring landlords maintain reasonable returns on their investments. The cap sets a maximum percentage or fixed amount by which rents can be raised within a specified timeframe, typically annually.
The Objectives of Rent Caps
Affordable Housing: One of the primary goals of a Government Rent Cap is to create more affordable housing options for renters. By controlling rental increases, the government aims to reduce the financial strain on tenants, particularly in high-demand markets where rental prices can skyrocket.
Tenant Stability: Rent caps provide a sense of stability for renters by ensuring their housing costs do not unexpectedly surge beyond their means. This stability is particularly important for low-income households and families with fixed budgets.
Mitigating Gentrification: In areas experiencing rapid gentrification, rent caps can help protect long-time residents from being priced out of their neighborhoods. By limiting rent increases, the government seeks to preserve socio-economic diversity and prevent the displacement of vulnerable communities.
Encouraging Long-term Tenancies: Rent caps can incentivize long-term tenancies, as landlords might be less inclined to evict reliable, established tenants when they are unable to raise rent significantly.
The Pros of Rent Caps
Housing Affordability: Rent caps directly address housing affordability concerns, allowing tenants to allocate a more reasonable portion of their income to housing costs. This financial relief can positively impact the overall quality of life for renters.
Tenant Security: By limiting rent hikes, rent caps provide tenants with greater security and peace of mind, reducing the fear of losing their homes due to unaffordable rent increases.
Neighborhood Stability: Rent caps can contribute to stable and cohesive communities, as long-time residents are less likely to be displaced by the influx of wealthier newcomers.
The Cons of Rent Caps
Supply Constraints: Critics argue that rent caps can discourage investment in the rental market. Landlords might be hesitant to maintain or improve properties if they believe their potential returns are limited, leading to decreased supply and poorer housing conditions.
Reduced Property Maintenance: With rent increases limited, landlords might be less motivated to invest in property maintenance and upgrades, potentially leading to a decline in the quality of rental units.
Black Market Effects: Some economists warn that strict rent caps may lead to a black market for rentals, where landlords and tenants engage in illegal arrangements, circumventing the regulations and potentially exacerbating housing inequalities.
Inefficiency: Rent caps may not efficiently target those in need, as they benefit all tenants equally, regardless of their income or financial situation. This means that some affluent tenants may also benefit from the caps, even though they can afford higher rents.
Landlords Causing Emotional Distress
While renting a home is often considered a convenient and practical solution for many, the experience can sometimes turn into a nightmare when landlords inflict emotional distress upon their tenants. The relationship between landlords and tenants should be built on trust, respect, and fairness. Unfortunately, not all landlords adhere to these principles, leading to dire consequences for the mental well-being of their tenants.
The Landlord-Tenant Relationship
The landlord-tenant relationship is a crucial aspect of the rental housing market. It sets the tone for the entire renting experience and plays a significant role in determining the tenant’s satisfaction and comfort. A good landlord-tenant relationship fosters mutual respect, open communication, and prompt resolution of issues. However, when landlords abuse their power or act unethically, it can lead to emotional distress for tenants.
Common Causes of Emotional Distress
Harassment and Intimidation: Some landlords resort to harassment and intimidation tactics to pressure tenants into compliance or evict them unlawfully. Frequent unannounced visits, aggressive communication, or threats of eviction can create a hostile living environment,causing immense emotional distress to tenants.If a landlord gives you the impression that if he/she does not like what you say they will threaten you or give condescending remarks, to the point you feel downgraded and humiliated. Or if you are too afraid to say anything because you are afraid of being evicted.
Negligence and Delayed Repairs: Neglecting essential repairs and maintenance issues can result in a hazardous living situation for tenants. Persistent delays in fixing vital utilities or failing to address safety concerns can cause anxiety, frustration, and feelings of helplessness in tenants.
Invasion of Privacy: Respect for tenants’ privacy is paramount, but some landlords breach this trust by entering the rental property without proper notice or valid reasons. Such intrusions can leave tenants feeling violated and unsafe in their own homes.
Discrimination and Unfair Treatment: Discrimination based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability is not only morally reprehensible but also illegal. Landlords who engage in discriminatory practices cause immense emotional distress to their tenants, impacting their self-esteem and sense of belonging. Controlling how you conduct your work or your personal life is discrimination.
Retaliation:Some landlords retaliate against tenants who assert their rights or report issues by raising rent, making false claims, or threatening eviction. Such retaliation can induce immense stress and anxiety, creating an atmosphere of fear for tenants.
Impact on Tenants’ Well-being
Emotional distress caused by landlords can have severe consequences on tenants’ mental health and overall well-being. The stress and anxiety resulting from a toxic landlord-tenant relationship can lead to sleep disturbances, depression, decreased productivity, and strained interpersonal relationships. Moreover, it can negatively affect tenants’ ability to concentrate on work or studies, leading to a downward spiral of stress and helplessness.
Seeking Solutions For Preparation of Litigation For Emotional Distress
Know Your Rights: Educate yourself about tenant rights and familiarize yourself with local tenant laws and regulations. This knowledge will empower you to identify any unlawful actions taken by the landlord and take appropriate action.
Document Everything: Keep a record of all communication with the landlord, including emails, letters, and texts. Additionally, document any instances of harassment, invasion of privacy, or delayed repairs, as these records can be crucial evidence if legal action becomes necessary.
Seek Mediation: If possible, try to resolve conflicts through mediation or arbitration, where an unbiased third party can help facilitate a resolution between you and your landlord.
Reach Out for Support: Talk to friends, family, or support groups about your situation. Emotional support can be immensely helpful during difficult times.
Legal Assistance: If the situation escalates and becomes unbearable, consider seeking legal advice from a tenant rights organization or an attorney specializing in landlord-tenant disputes.
How To Report Rogue Landlords: Protecting Your Rights as a Tenant
When it comes to rental housing, there are responsible landlords who adhere to the law and prioritize tenant satisfaction. However, there are also rogue landlords who engage in unethical practices, violating their tenants’ rights and neglecting their responsibilities. As a tenant, encountering a rogue landlord can be distressing and challenging, but it is crucial to take action and report such misconduct.
Identify Rogue Landlord Behavior: Before reporting a rogue landlord, it is essential to recognize the signs of unethical behavior. Common indicators of a rogue landlord include (a) Failure to carry out necessary repairs or maintenance on the property, leading to safety hazards or property damage.(b) Ignoring tenant complaints or retaliating against them for raising concerns. (c) Illegally increasing the rent or using unfair and unjust eviction practices. (d) Providing unsafe living conditions, such as inadequate heating, water, or pest infestations. (e) Violating your privacy rights by entering the property without proper notice. (f) Failing to protect your security deposit or refusing to return it without a valid reason.
Gather Evidence: When reporting a rogue landlord, having solid evidence to support your claims is crucial. Keep a detailed record of all interactions with the landlord, including emails, text messages, or any written communication. Additionally, document any issues with the property, take photographs if necessary, and retain copies of relevant documents like your lease agreement and receipts for rent payments.
Know Your Rights and Local Laws: Familiarize yourself with tenant rights in your area and local rental laws. Every region has specific regulations that govern landlord-tenant relationships, and knowing your rights will empower you to take appropriate action. Seek guidance from local tenant advocacy groups, legal aid organizations, or government housing agencies if you need assistance understanding your rights.
Communicate with Your Landlord: Before jumping to reporting, try to resolve issues amicably by communicating with your landlord. Provide written notice of any problems you encounter and request reasonable solutions. This approach gives your landlord an opportunity to address the issues, and in some cases, it may lead to a resolution without the need for formal reporting.
Contact Relevant Authorities: If your attempts to resolve the matter directly with your landlord fail, it is time to escalate the issue. Contact the appropriate housing authority in your area to report the rogue landlord’s actions. This may be the local housing department, housing ombudsman, or a tenant rights organization. When making a report, be sure to include all relevant evidence and a clear and concise description of the issues you are facing. The more specific and detailed your complaint, the more likely it will be thoroughly investigated.
Seek Legal Advice: If the rogue landlord’s behavior persists, or if the situation is severe and affecting your health or safety, consider seeking legal advice. An attorney experienced in landlord-tenant law can guide you through the process and advocate on your behalf. Some regions offer free legal aid to tenants facing disputes with their landlords.
Raise Awareness: Informing others about your experiences with a rogue landlord can be beneficial. Share your story with friends, and family, or on social media platforms. Raising awareness about unethical practices may encourage others to speak out or avoid renting from the same rogue landlord in the future.
Electrical Safety Inspections
The Vital Responsibility of Landlords in Ensuring Electrical Safety Inspections and Certificate Dissemination to Tenants
The safety and well-being of tenants should always be the foremost concern for landlords. One crucial aspect of ensuring a safe living environment is the proper inspection of electrical systems in rental properties. Landlords hold the responsibility to conduct regular Electrical Safety Inspections and to provide their tenants with a copy of the certificate.
Importance of Electrical Safety Inspections
Electricity is a fundamental utility in modern living, yet it also poses various risks when not adequately maintained. Electrical hazards, such as electrical fires, shocks, and other accidents, can have catastrophic consequences for both tenants and properties. Electrical Safety Inspections are designed to identify potential hazards, faulty wiring, outdated systems, and other issues that might compromise the safety of the occupants.
Legal Obligations: In many jurisdictions, there are specific laws and regulations that outline the responsibilities of landlords concerning electrical safety. These laws often require landlords to ensure that the electrical systems in their rental properties meet certain safety standards. To fulfill this obligation, regular Electrical Safety Inspections are essential. By complying with legal requirements, landlords not only protect their tenants but also shield themselves from potential legal liabilities.
Ensuring Tenant Safety: The primary objective of conducting Electrical Safety Inspections is to safeguard the well-being of the tenants. Electricity-related accidents can result in injuries, property damage, and even fatalities. Regular inspections help identify potential issues before they escalate, enabling prompt repairs or upgrades to mitigate risks effectively.
Preventing Property Damage: Faulty electrical systems can cause damage to the property itself. For instance, electrical fires can quickly engulf an entire building, leading to significant destruction and financial losses. Through inspections, landlords can address problems early on, reducing the risk of property damage and ensuring the longevity of their investment.
Tenant Retention and Attracting New Tenants: Tenant satisfaction and safety play a pivotal role in retaining current tenants and attracting new ones. Responsible landlords who prioritize electrical safety create a positive reputation for their properties, which can lead to long-term tenancies and increased demand for rental units.
Landlord Responsibilities for Electrical Safety Inspections
Scheduling Regular Inspections: Landlords should schedule regular Electrical Safety Inspections, adhering to local regulations and safety standards. The frequency of inspections may vary depending on local laws, the age of the property, and the complexity of its electrical systems. Typical intervals for inspections could range from one to five years.
Hiring Qualified Electricians: It is essential that landlords hire licensed and qualified electricians to perform the inspections. Competent electricians have the expertise to identify potential hazards, ensure compliance with safety codes, and recommend appropriate solutions.
Documenting and Providing Certificates: Upon successful completion of the Electrical Safety Inspection, landlords should obtain a certificate or report from the electrician. This document should outline the inspection findings, any identified issues, and the recommended actions taken to address them. Landlords must promptly provide a copy of this certificate to the tenant, as it serves as evidence of compliance with safety regulations and demonstrates a commitment to tenant’s well-being.
Fire Extinguishers Maintenance
The Essential Role of Landlords in Fire Extinguisher Maintenance: Ensuring Tenant Safety
Landlord, the safety and well-being of your tenants should always be a top priority. Among the various safety measures to implement in rental properties, maintaining fire extinguishers plays a crucial role in mitigating the risk of fire-related emergencies. Fire extinguishers are essential tools that can save lives and protect property when used correctly.
Understanding the Importance of Fire Extinguishers: Fire extinguishers are the first line of defense against small fires that could escalate into disastrous blazes if left unchecked. They are designed to extinguish fires quickly before they spread, providing occupants with valuable time to evacuate safely and potentially minimize property damage. Having functioning fire extinguishers readily available in rental properties can make all the difference in safeguarding lives and assets during an emergency.
Legal Requirements and Regulations: There are specific legal requirements and regulations pertaining to fire extinguisher maintenance for rental properties. Landlords must familiarize themselves with these laws to ensure compliance and avoid potential liability in the event of a fire-related incident. Typically, regulations may include:(a) Regular Inspections: Fire extinguishers should be inspected at regular intervals, usually once a year, by a licensed professional to ensure they are in good working condition and meet safety standards.(b) Testing and Certification: Apart from inspections, fire extinguishers may require hydrostatic testing every few years to verify their structural integrity and pressure-holding capabilities (c) Proper Placement: Fire extinguishers must be appropriately located and easily accessible throughout the property. The exact requirements may vary depending on local fire codes.
Engaging Professional Services: Maintaining fire extinguishers goes beyond simply placing them in strategic locations. Engaging the services of a certified fire safety professional is crucial for comprehensive inspections and servicing. These professionals possess the knowledge and expertise to assess the condition of fire extinguishers accurately and perform any necessary repairs or replacements. Regular maintenance ensures that the fire extinguishers remain functional and reliable when needed.
Educating Tenants on Fire Safety: As a responsible landlord, it is essential to educate your tenants about fire safety measures, including the proper use of fire extinguishers. Provide written instructions and visual aids to help tenants understand the different classes of fires and which type of extinguisher is appropriate for each. Conduct periodic fire safety drills to ensure tenants are familiar with evacuation procedures and the location of fire extinguishers.
Implementing a Maintenance Schedule: To ensure that fire extinguishers are consistently and adequately maintained, landlords should implement a maintenance schedule. Keep accurate records of all inspections, tests, and repairs conducted on each extinguisher. A well-documented maintenance history can serve as evidence of compliance with legal requirements and demonstrate a commitment to tenant safety.
Should It Be The Responsibility of the Tenant To Tell The Electrical Safety Inspectors To Do Their Jobs Properly
Electrical safety is a paramount concern for both tenants and landlords in any rental property. Electrical safety inspections play a crucial role in ensuring that the electrical systems within a property are up to code, minimizing the risk of electrical hazards and potential accidents. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether tenants should be responsible for ensuring that electrical safety inspectors perform their jobs properly.
The Role of Electrical Safety Inspectors: Electrical safety inspectors are professionals trained to inspect electrical installations and systems within properties to assess their compliance with safety regulations. They play a critical role in identifying potential hazards, faulty wiring, outdated equipment, and other safety risks that might not be apparent to a regular person. The primary objective of electrical safety inspections is to protect the occupants of the property from electrical accidents and ensure that the property adheres to the relevant electrical safety standards.
Landlord’s Responsibility: Landlords have a legal obligation to provide a safe living environment for their tenants. This responsibility includes ensuring that the property’s electrical system is in good working condition and meets safety regulations. As part of this obligation, landlords must arrange for regular electrical safety inspections carried out by qualified inspectors. They should address any identified issues promptly and take necessary corrective actions to maintain the safety of the property.
Tenant’s Role in Electrical Safety: While tenants are not experts in electrical safety, they also have certain responsibilities concerning electrical safety in the rental property. Tenants should promptly report any visible electrical hazards, irregularities, or malfunctioning electrical appliances to the landlord. This proactive approach ensures that landlords are aware of potential issues and can take appropriate actions.
The Debate: Should Tenants Monitor Inspectors.
The question arises whether tenants should be responsible for overseeing the work of electrical safety inspectors. Some argue that tenants should play a more active role in monitoring inspections to ensure the thoroughness and accuracy of the process. Advocates of this viewpoint believe that tenants have a vested interest in their own safety and are more likely to notice subtle issues that an inspector might overlook.
On the other hand, opponents argue that placing the responsibility on tenants to monitor inspectors is unrealistic and unfair. Tenants are not trained professionals and may not have the expertise to evaluate the inspector’s competency. Moreover, adding this burden to tenants could potentially lead to unnecessary conflicts between tenants and inspectors or create confusion about roles and responsibilities.
The Ideal Approach: Collaboration and Communication
Rather than burdening tenants with the task of overseeing inspectors, a more effective approach is fostering collaboration and communication between tenants, landlords, and electrical safety inspectors. Tenants should promptly report any electrical concerns to landlords, who can then arrange for inspections by reputable and qualified professionals. In turn, landlords should hire licensed and experienced inspectors to conduct thorough examinations of the property’s electrical system.
Government Database Of Rogue Landlords
Government Database of Rogue Landlords: Ensuring Safe and Fair Housing for All
In recent years, the issue of rogue landlords has become a significant concern in many countries, affecting the lives of countless tenants. These unscrupulous individuals exploit vulnerable renters, subjecting them to unsafe living conditions, exorbitant rents, and neglect of their legal rights. To combat this problem and promote safe and fair housing, many governments have established a comprehensive database of rogue landlords. This database serves as a crucial tool in identifying, monitoring and penalizing those who disregard their responsibilities as landlords, while also safeguarding the rights and well-being of tenants.
Purpose of the Database:
The primary purpose of the Government Database of Rogue Landlords is to centralize information on landlords who have a proven track record of mistreating tenants or violating housing regulations. By creating a single repository of data, authorities can efficiently monitor and track the activities of rogue landlords across multiple properties and jurisdictions. The database aims to deter unethical practices and provide renters with vital information about the history of potential landlords, allowing them to make informed decisions when choosing their accommodation.
Contents of the Database:
The database contains a wide range of information related to rogue landlords and their properties. Some of the key data points include:
Landlord Information: This section includes the name, contact details, and relevant identification information of the landlord or property owner.
Property Details: Information about each property owned or managed by the landlord, such as the address, type of property, and the number of rental units.
Tenant Complaints: Records of formal complaints lodged by tenants against the landlord, outlining the nature of the issue and any subsequent actions taken.
Legal Violations: Documentation of any legal actions taken against the landlord, including fines, court orders, or other penalties related to housing violations.
Health and Safety Inspections: Results of inspections conducted on the landlord’s properties, indicating any health and safety hazards found and the corresponding actions required for compliance.
Eviction History: History of evictions carried out by the landlord, including reasons and adherence to legal procedures.
Ensuring Data Accuracy and Privacy:
To maintain the effectiveness and credibility of the database, utmost care must be taken to ensure the accuracy of the information it contains. Governments typically implement rigorous verification processes before adding any landlord to the database, requiring substantial evidence of wrongdoing or non-compliance.
Moreover, privacy concerns must be addressed to safeguard the rights of both tenants and landlords. Sensitive information, such as personal details of tenants or unsubstantiated allegations, should be redacted to prevent unwarranted harm to innocent parties.
Benefits and Impact:
The establishment of a Government Database of Rogue Landlords has several benefits:
Tenant Empowerment: Prospective renters can access the database to research potential landlords, enabling them to avoid renting from unscrupulous individuals and ensuring their rights are protected.
Encouraging Landlord Compliance: The fear of being listed in the database acts as a deterrent for landlords, encouraging them to adhere to housing regulations and treat their tenants fairly.
Streamlined Enforcement: Authorities can efficiently identify and focus on problematic landlords, allocating resources to areas where tenant rights are most at risk.
Improved Housing Standards: By holding rogue landlords accountable, the database indirectly contributes to raising overall housing standards in the country.
The Renters Reform Bill represents a significant milestone in the UK’s quest for tenant rights and housing security. By abolishing Section 21 no-fault eviction notices and introducing open-ended tenancies, the bill aims to provide renters with greater stability, security, and the ability to assert their rights without fear of retaliation. Moreover, it acknowledges and addresses the concerns of landlords, promoting a fair and equitable rental market. As the bill moves through legislative processes, it is essential for policymakers and stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue, ensuring that the final legislation is robust and comprehensive in protecting both tenants and landlords. Ultimately, the Renters Reform Bill sets a precedent for a more just and balanced rental housing system, fostering healthier communities and empowering renters across the nation.
Homelessness continues to be a pressing issue in the UK, affecting thousands of individuals and families across the nation. Addressing this crisis requires a multifaceted approach that involves collaboration between government bodies, non-profit organizations, and communities. Providing stable housing, mental health support, employment opportunities, and preventative measures are essential steps towards reducing homelessness and ensuring a brighter future for those who have fallen through the cracks of society.
Rent increases are a reality of the rental market, but it is crucial for both landlords and tenants to approach the matter with fairness and understanding. For tenants, being aware of their rights and responsibilities is essential to protect themselves from unjust rent increases and potential housing instability. Maintaining a reasonable and considerate approach to rent adjustments for landlords can foster positive landlord-tenant relationships and contribute to stable and thriving rental communities. While not all landlords engage in practices that cause financial difficulty for renters, it is crucial to recognize and address these issues when they arise. Responsible property management, clear communication, and adherence to fair housing practices are essential in creating a harmonious landlord-tenant relationship. Moreover, policymakers should consider measures to protect tenants from exploitative practices, ensuring that rental housing remains accessible and affordable for all. By fostering an environment of mutual respect and empathy, we can work towards a more equitable and sustainable rental market, benefiting both landlords and tenants alike.
Landlord Obligations – Landlord comes with significant responsibilities beyond merely owning a property and collecting rent. Providing safe and habitable accommodations, complying with local laws, and maintaining open communication with tenants are among the key obligations every landlord should uphold. Fulfilling these responsibilities will not only contribute to a successful and harmonious tenancy but also create a positive and respectful environment for both landlords and tenants.
The Government Rent Cap is a complex policy tool aimed at addressing the pressing issues of housing affordability and tenant security. While it offers significant advantages such as affordable housing and tenant stability, its drawbacks cannot be overlooked, including potential supply constraints and reduced property maintenance. As governments grapple with the challenges of the housing crisis, finding the right balance between protecting tenants and promoting a healthy rental market remains a critical task. Implementing a flexible and nuanced rent control policy and other complementary housing initiatives may hold the key to ensuring housing stability for all citizens while fostering a sustainable rental market for landlords and investors alike. However, landlords should be aware of the rent cap to refrain from charging extortionate rent increases according to the Government Guidelines. Any landlord that is found to have stepped over the mark should refund the overpayment to the tenant.
The emotional distress caused by landlords can turn a place that should feel like home into a source of anxiety and fear. It is essential to address these issues promptly and seek assistance to protect your well-being and rights as a tenant. By promoting awareness and holding landlords accountable for their actions, we can strive to create a rental housing environment where tenants feel respected, safe, and at peace in their homes. When a tenant is struggling to make ends meet and has more outgoings than income, then the landlord should take that into consideration. If the landlord claims he is charging the local market rate and it is proven he is charging more than that, then he should be made to refund the tenant and if the landlord has caused a person’s health to deteriorate because he/she thinks he can print money and the tenant can prove their health is documented with the NHS citing that the landlord has made them unwell, then the landlord should compensate for emotional distress (tort). https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/emotional-distress-compensation/
Furthermore, if you are self-employed and you have in your contract that you cannot run a business including administration from your property, and as a consequence, Google suspends your business pages because you have no physical address the landlord should pay for the loss of business. Some people have online businesses and work from home, and some people are disabled and cannot commute or afford to rent an office just to have a physical address, yet for search engine optimization (SEO) Google and other search engines & Business Wales require a physical address in order for your business to have a listing.
Dealing with a rogue landlord can be stressful and emotionally taxing, but it is crucial to stand up for your rights as a tenant. By identifying rogue landlord behavior, gathering evidence, and understanding your rights, you can take the necessary steps to protect yourself and report the misconduct. Remember to communicate with your landlord, escalate the issue to relevant authorities, and seek legal advice when needed. Reporting rogue landlords not only safeguards your rights but also helps ensure a better living environment for all tenants.
The responsibility of landlords to conduct regular Electrical Safety Inspections and make sure everything is inspected on the checklist, as well as furnish tenants with the accompanying certificates is a critical aspect of rental property management. By ensuring electrical safety, landlords protect their tenants, properties, and themselves from potential legal and financial consequences. Ultimately, this commitment to safety fosters a positive living environment, enhances tenant satisfaction, and contributes to the overall success of a rental property venture.
As a landlord, your responsibility to address mold in the home goes beyond merely providing a roof over your tenant’s head. Creating a safe and healthy living environment is paramount. By conducting regular inspections, promptly responding to tenant complaints, identifying and addressing the source of moisture, and implementing preventative measures, you can minimize the risk of mold growth and ensure the well-being of your tenants. Proactive mold management not only protects your investment but also fosters a positive landlord-tenant relationship based on trust and mutual respect.
Fire safety is a collective responsibility, and landlords have a crucial role to play in ensuring the safety of their tenants. Fire extinguishers are vital tools that can help prevent the escalation of small fires into major disasters. By adhering to legal regulations, engaging professional services, and educating tenants, landlords can maintain fire extinguishers effectively and provide their tenants with a safer living environment. The investment in fire extinguisher maintenance not only protects your tenants but also safeguards your property and gives everyone peace of mind in the face of potential fire hazards. Let us prioritize fire safety and work together to make our rental properties secure for all occupants.
Electrical safety in rental properties is a shared responsibility between landlords electrical safety inspectors and tenants. While tenants should promptly report any visible issues to landlords, the primary responsibility for arranging proper inspections and ensuring electrical safety lies with the landlords. (For example – in the case of an electrician who checked a fitting and did not report it, he can be prosecuted, just the same as the landlord not providing an EICR to the tenant). Open communication and collaboration between all parties involved will lead to a safer living environment for tenants and protect landlords from potential liabilities. It is not the tenant’s responsibility to tell electrical safety inspectors how to do their jobs properly. Instead, tenants should focus on promptly reporting any concerns to their landlords, who, in turn, should engage qualified inspectors to carry out thorough electrical safety inspections, (For example:if the issue has been reported to the landlord and he/she has defended the electricians by saying this was not part of the inspection and have not attempted to rectify the problem themselves, they are at risk of prosecution). This collaborative approach will ensure a safe and secure living environment for all occupants.
The Government Database of Rogue Landlords is an essential tool in the fight against unethical and neglectful practices in the rental housing market. By centralizing data and promoting transparency, governments can protect tenants, enhance housing conditions, and foster a fairer and safer living environment for all citizens. Continuous monitoring, regular updates, and a commitment to privacy are vital to ensuring the database’s effectiveness and integrity in achieving its objectives. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/database-of-rogue-landlords-and-property-agents-under-the-housing-and-planning-act-2016
Breaching Contracts and the Law
If a landlord fails to give a tenant an EPC certificate or an EICR certificate, they are breaking the law.
If a landlord fails to rectify rising dampness and mold issuesand tells the tenant to wash the walls with soapy water and bleach, but your furniture is damaged the landlord should compensate for the damage.
If the tenant then becomes severely unwell because of the mold problem, the landlord can be prosecuted. If the landlord has been verbally notified multiple times and has not done roof insulation or rectified the mold problem other than telling the tenant to wash the walls down with bleach and soapy water, he/she is liable.
If the landlord fails to maintain fire extinguishers and says the fire doors are adequate to prevent a fire, they are breaking the law.
If the tenant notices that there is a potential fire hazard because of hot zones and extension leads close to cookers or washing machines plugged into extension leads not hard-wired, (with leads trailing on the floor) assuming the electrical inspection certificate spotted it, which a tenant should have had a copy of, the landlord is breaking the law and the electrician should be prosecuted.
Lead from paint or water/waste pipes can potentially cause nervous disorders, and mental health or behavioral problems. Paint with a high level of lead content tends to be found in older houses and dissolved lead is only likely in acidic (i.e. usually private) water supplies. If the pipes have not been checked and maintained by the landlord and it is found that the tenant’s health has deteriorated the landlord is at risk of being prosecuted. What Does a Landlord Need to Do About Lead Paint and Pipes? – Landlord insider (landlordvision.co.uk)
If the tenant’s home was inspected by an electrician the tenant was not given a copy of an EICR certificate and their main lighting was not fixed which caused inadequate lighting and health problems, then the landlord who would have seen the certificate did not act on the checklist, the landlord and electrician can be prosecuted.
If the landlord causes a tenant emotional distress due to financial difficulty because of a rent hike and above the stated government rent cap, the landlord can be prosecuted for intentionally causing someone’s mental health to deteriorate. Market Research would state how much properties cost in a local area and if the tenant can prove they have been overcharged it is up to the landlord to refund the difference.
If a landlord disrupts your work if you work from home (remotely) or inconveniences you, he/she should compensate you for the interruption.
If the landlord states that the tenant cannot have visitors, or people staying overnight, that is discrimination and is against the law. According to the UK government website, you have the right to decide who you want to invite into your home, just as homeowners do. If your landlord tries to control who can visit you, this could be considered harassment. If you have exclusive possession of the entire property (such as a sole occupancy AST or joint tenancy agreement), your landlord cannot restrict who can visit. The right to the enjoyment of life: Article 14: Protection from discrimination | Equality and Human Rights Commission (equalityhumanrights.com)
If you feel there could be repercussions from you voicing your concerns with the landlord and you feel a sense of fear and intimidation because the landlord has selective memory loss when you have brought up concerns in the past and threatens you with eviction if you do not do as he/she says, you may have a case against him or her.
If you have suffered a financial loss because the landlord has increased the rent over the rent cap and local market prices and you have evidence of this, then you can argue this in court.
If you cannot optimize your business because of stipulations in the contract and your business has been affected by this because your landlord does not allow you to use your address for admin purposes and search engine optimization, you may have a case against your landlord.
If your mental health has deteriorated and are suffering emotional distress and financial difficulty because you cannot conduct your business properly and you are finding it hard to pay the extortionate price increase your landlord has burdened you with, then the landlord will have to compensate you.
Even if you do not live in Cambridgeshire but support the cause, do take a moment to sign. If you are supporting the NHS think about how it will affect the healthcare system in the long term.
The Wisbech Incinerator Project is a proposed waste management facility located in Wisbech, a market town in Cambridgeshire, England. The project aims to address the issue of waste management in the area by providing a modern and efficient facility for the safe disposal of non-recyclable waste.
The project is being developed by MVV Environment, a German-based company that specializes in energy and waste management solutions. The proposed facility is expected to have a capacity of 50 megawatts, which is equivalent to the energy required to power approximately 50,000 homes.
The incinerator will use a process called energy from waste (EfW) to generate electricity from non-recyclable waste. The process involves burning waste at high temperatures to produce steam, which is then used to drive turbines and generate electricity. This method of waste disposal is considered to be a more sustainable and environmentally friendly solution than landfill, as it reduces the amount of waste going to landfills and also generates electricity.
The Wisbech Incinerator Project has been the subject of much debate and controversy since it was first proposed. Supporters of the project argue that it will provide much-needed energy and waste management solutions, create jobs, and boost the local economy. They also point out that the project will help to reduce the amount of waste going to landfill, which can have a significant impact on the environment and public health.
Opponents of the project, on the other hand, argue that the incinerator will generate air pollution and pose a risk to public health. They also argue that the facility will discourage recycling efforts and promote a culture of waste generation.
Despite the controversy surrounding the project, MVV Environment has continued to push for its development, and the project has received planning permission from the local council. However, the project still faces significant opposition from local residents and environmental groups, and it remains to be seen whether it will be completed.
The Wisbech Incinerator Project is a proposed waste management facility that aims to provide a sustainable and environmentally friendly solution to the issue of waste disposal in the area. While it has faced significant opposition, supporters argue that it will provide much-needed energy and waste management solutions, create jobs, and boost the local economy. It is clear that the issue of waste management is a pressing one that requires innovative and sustainable solutions.
Why Is It Being Petitioned
The Wisbech Incinerator Project is being petitioned by local residents and environmental groups who are concerned about the potential negative impact of the facility on the local environment and public health.
Opponents of the project argue that the incinerator will generate air pollution, which could have serious health consequences for local residents.They also argue that the facility will discourage recycling efforts and promote a culture of waste generation, as people may feel that they can dispose of non-recyclable waste without considering more sustainable options.
In addition to health and environmental concerns, opponents of the project also argue that it will have a negative impact on the local community. They believe that the incinerator will create noise and traffic problems, and may also affect property values in the area.
Furthermore, opponents of the project argue that there are alternative waste management solutions that should be explored, such as increasing recycling rates and reducing waste generation. They argue that the incinerator is a short-term solution that does not address the root causes of the waste management problem.
Despite the concerns of opponents, supporters of the project argue that the incinerator will provide much-needed energy and waste management solutions, create jobs, and boost the local economy. They also argue that the project has been subject to rigorous environmental and health impact assessments and that any potential risks have been identified and addressed.
The Wisbech Incinerator Project is being petitioned by local residents and environmental groups who are concerned about the potential negative impact of the facility on the local environment, public health, and community. While supporters of the project argue that it will provide much-needed energy and waste management solutions, opponents believe that alternative solutions should be explored and that the incinerator is not the best way to address the issue of waste management.
Why has the health secretary Steven Barclay gotten involved
The health secretary, Steven Barclay, may have gotten involved in the Wisbech Incinerator Project due to concerns about the potential impact of the facility on public health. As the health secretary, he is responsible for ensuring that public health is protected and that any potential risks to health are identified and addressed.
In 2019, Steven Barclay expressed his concerns about the project in a letter to the local council, stating that he had “serious concerns” about the potential impact of the incinerator on air quality and public health. He also called for a full assessment of the potential health impacts of the project.
His involvement in the project may also be related to the fact that Wisbech is located in his constituency of North East Cambridgeshire. As the local MP, he has a responsibility to represent the views and concerns of his constituents and to ensure that their interests are protected.
If the incinerator does generate air pollution and pose a risk to public health, this could lead to increased demand for healthcare services, which could put a strain on the NHS.
Conclusion
The health secretary, Stephen Barclay, has gotten involved in the Wisbech Incinerator Project due to concerns about the potential impact of the facility on public health, as well as his responsibility to represent the views and concerns of his constituents and to ensure that the wider healthcare system is not adversely affected.
We will update you on this story…
ADVERTISEMENT
If you valued this article and wish us to write content for you, please contact us using the form below:
** Disclaimer** I have purposely turned my notifications off because of the impending catastrophe waiting to happen and the repercussions of my mental health having to worry, will Britain get through this? It was only because a client of mine in Serbia emailed me he is worried that I decided to have a look. According to the headline written by LLB Political Reporter (no name), he claims Sunak has warned Britain. For those that do not read national papers and perhaps do not have internet access, he has not done a good job of warning Britain. I understand putting this in mainstream media may cause a moral panic, but at least tell people to stock up on survival equipment and tinned food. Hopefully, we will not need any of this but it is better to be safe than sorry: 75 Emergency Supplies List You Should Always Stock at Home (morningchores.com)
Concerns
The Former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak and now Prime Minister has warned that the United Kingdom is now “ready for conflict” against Russia amid “growing international volatility.” The warning comes as tensions between the two countries have been escalating in recent years, with Russia accused of various acts of aggression against the UK and its allies.
In a speech delivered at the annual Lord Mayor’s Banquet in London, Sunak said that the UK must be prepared to “act decisively” to protect its interests and those of its allies. He warned that “we cannot ignore the threat posed by Russia,” adding that “our adversaries are using a range of tactics to undermine our security and prosperity.”
Sunak’s remarks come as the UK has been increasingly vocal in its criticism of Russia’s actions on the world stage. In recent years, Russia has been accused of interfering in the 2016 US presidential election, carrying out cyberattacks against a number of countries, and violating the sovereignty of Ukraine.
The UK has also accused Russia of being behind the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury in 2018. The incident led to a major diplomatic row between the UK and Russia, with both countries expelling each other’s diplomats.
Sunak’s warning reflects growing concern among Western countries about Russia’s increasing assertiveness on the world stage. The country has been investing heavily in its military capabilities in recent years and has also been accused of using disinformation and propaganda to undermine Western democracies.
However, while the UK has been vocal in its criticism of Russia, it remains to be seen what concrete action it will take to counter the threat posed by the country. The UK has traditionally been a key player in NATO, the military alliance of Western countries, and has also maintained close ties with the United States.
It is possible that the UK will seek to take a more assertive stance against Russia in the coming years, particularly if tensions continue to escalate. However, any such action would need to be carefully calibrated to avoid a direct military confrontation, which could have catastrophic consequences for both countries and the wider world.
In the meantime, Sunak’s warning serves as a reminder of the growing tensions between the UK and Russia, and the need for Western countries to remain vigilant and prepared to act to protect the nation.
Do world leaders not care about killing people in war
War is an unfortunate reality that has existed for centuries, and with it comes the unfortunate reality of casualties. In modern times, war has evolved to become more lethal and devastating, resulting in the deaths of countless civilians and soldiers alike. Despite the tragic consequences of war, world leaders continue to engage in armed conflicts without much regard for the lives of those caught in the crossfire.
One of the reasons why world leaders seem to be indifferent to the loss of life in war is the dehumanization of the enemy. In most cases, leaders tend to depict the opposing side as evil and inhumane, making it easier to justify the use of force. This portrayal of the enemy as sub-human makes it easier for soldiers to kill without remorse and for civilians to support their country’s actions, even if it means the deaths of innocent people.
Another reason why world leaders seem to be apathetic towards the loss of life in war is the idea of “collateral damage.” Collateral damage refers to the unintentional harm caused to civilians or their property during military operations. While world leaders often express regret for civilian deaths, they tend to downplay the severity of the situation, arguing that the deaths were a regrettable but necessary consequence of war.
Moreover, the idea of national interest plays a significant role in justifying the use of force. Many world leaders argue that war is necessary
However, it is important to recognize that decisions regarding war and military action are often complex and involve a range of factors such as geopolitical interests, security concerns, and humanitarian considerations. While some leaders may believe that military action is necessary for the greater good, others may have different motives or be influenced by external pressures. Additionally, the impact of these decisions on innocent civilians is often a tragic consequence that cannot be overlooked. It is important for leaders to consider the consequences of their actions and make decisions that prioritize the safety and well-being of all individuals involved.
Have you ever wondered why everything is going up in the UK at an alarming rate? Are we led to believe that everything is going up because of Put#ns W#r? (Words are being censored).
The reality is something I have been saying for some time and that is the UK Government is in debt.
Borrowing November just gone was more than double what it was of November 2021.
Interest on government debts stood at £7.3 billion, up £2.4 billion on the same time last year.
Public sector net debt was up to 98.7% of GDP from 98.2% the previous month.
Danni Hewson, AJ Bell financial analyst,commented on the latest public sector finances: “Even in the midst of the pandemic November’s borrowing figures didn’t reach the heights, they’ve reached this year. The government’s simply spending far more than it’s bringing in despite the fact the tax take has increased significantly. One major factor behind the rise in borrowing costs is our old adversary inflation. Interest payments on all that debt have shot up to reach another record high for the month, coming in at more than seven billion pounds, a rise of almost two and a half billion on November 2021“.
This then has a knock-on effect on the citizens of the UK. When we left the EU, the UK automatically owed trillions in debt.
My argument then and still stands today Brexit was sold on the fact with a lot of people wanted to vote out of the EU because of immigration. But immigration actually boosted the economy because whilst they worked they were paying taxes and buying and shipping abroad. Immigration has now escalated to another level of helping Ukrainians to start new lives whilst escaping their war-torn country.
So my point was would you allow a bunch of strangers to decide what is good for your company/business or would you entrust financial advisors? The same can be said that people who do not have an ounce of common sense let alone political or economic knowledge why were they given a chance to vote on the state of our country?
Everyone that voted out is now left to blame for the mess the UK is in and it’s only going to get worse.
If you do not know what you are talking about do not pretend that you do. By voting, you impact the country in the long run. People should educate themselves before talking about politics or economics and should not be made to vote unless they have passed an IQ test.
UK inflation: Is Brexit causing it to accelerate?
Former Bank of England policymaker Adam Posen insists that 80 percent of the reason why the UK has the highest inflation of any G7 country is due to the impact of Brexit on immigration and the labour market.
He warned: “You’ve seen a huge drop in migrant labour, a disruption in labour markets that everybody experienced due to Covid and reopening, but with fundamentally less elasticity… and that [Brexit] has to be a major part of it,” he told a conference at Kings College in London.
**Article was written and published on the 4th of March 2021 at 4.16 pm GMT.
Today and it was my fault for latching on to a post on Facebook about an appeal by South Wales Police about laser pointers, and I received some backlash for merely trying to clear up some confusion in my mind.
My mistake was I commented on someone’s shared post and got hate for it. It was no different from what I have said below although I have further elaborated on my statement.
The link is also here:Facebook SWPC Article.Obviously, the people or persons that pointed the laser should be punished under the terrorism act.
The reason why I latched on was that I could not believe that a simple pocket laser could cause harm or injure a pilot airborne or crew member when the culprit was on the ground, according to the original post an on-board critical care practitioner suffered blurred vision, and migraine, and had to go off-duty (This implies the injury was serious). Obviously, I was naive about laser pointers and have since learned a thing or two.
The incident happened on Sunday 28th February 2021 at 9.30 pm over Heath Roath Park and Roath Recreation Ground in Cardiff UK. The laser was directed at a Wales Air Ambulance causing injuries to a crew member.
This is what a laser pointer looks like from the groundaccording to the blogger of this paper link below:
I obviously did some research and fact-checking and all I got was negative people trolling me, with one stating that my shared links were belittling the crime and that what I was sharing weretheoretical papers, even going as far as insinuating I had some ulterior motive to make the comment. (I do not take kindly to accusations), the said person (mentioning no names) even demanded I explain myself.
Also, it was unclear how come the pilot was not mentioned. unless the person was a paramedic and pilot.
When writing articles one should be clear about the content so as to not confuse the reader. One should not write one line and hope the reader will second guess the rest.
The only reason for the Facebook Comment if I am brutally honest was to establish facts and clear up any confusion, first of all, there was no mention of how far the helicopter was off the ground at the time of the incident?… so my question was how did the laser pointer affect a paramedics vision? Was the helicopter landing or taking off or in mid-air?
Good Journalism should not cause confusion.
A laser pointer can be a distraction for helicopter pilots that wear night vision goggles or airplanes that want to land, the same applies to military aircraft at night.
MOST IMPORTANTLY!
The most important part wasI was not condoning this in any way and all perpetrators should be punished to fit the crime. I was merely pointing out that there would be no adverse physical effects from this according to theFact Checking‘ I had made from two verified sources the BJO & BBC, links below:
I can see how serious pointing a laser at an aircraft can be to the aviation authority and it can be deemed as an act of terrorismand I certainly do not condone it.
Laser pointers can be distracting to pilots!
It seems to be a craze or fad for idiots to laser aircraft. Perhaps the powers that be should educate people in the masses about STUPIDITY with social awareness and media amplification that pointing lasers at aircraft is wrong on all levels, regardless if it affects a pilot or not. I can see that laser pointers can be distracting and potentially dangerous. https://www.laserpointersafety.com/laser-hazards_aircraft/laser-hazards_aircraft.html
I personally think that laser pointers should be banned from the public and only used and sold to businesses and higher education institutes. I also believe fireworks should also be banned from sale to the public or the public need a license. Fireworks should only be sold to organizations for public events or to people with fireworks licenses.
I am still open-minded about the distance a laser pointer would have had to be to cause any adverse effect to the paramedic, considering in the BJO a laser does not cause headaches, but temporary blindness similar to a flash on a camera going off.
I have since removed myself from the group. I do not know how Facebook groups work but I do not wish to be associated with narrow-minded people.
(Addendum) apparently, if you remove yourself from the group it still does not remove you from the thread, lesson learned, hence I had someone like my comment a few minutes ago.
My daughter gave me some solid advice: “if you do not want to be trolled do not leave comments as people do not like the truth”.
“I never once said that I was defending or condoning the culprits, I on the contrary was fact-checking”.
All I was doing was getting my head around the fact when one verified fact-checked source said one thing and I read something else from anothersource that is confusing and that is when I started to question the credibility of the information.
From what I can gather according to my verified source below, it is virtually impossible to have adverse physical effects from a laser on the ground whilst a pilot is airborne. If anything it can be a distraction when pilots wear nighttime goggles or are landing and may experience flash blindness.
However pointing a laser at an aircraft is an obstruction and should carry the punishment of an act of terrorism (and if it isn’t, it should be).
According to the Civil Aviation Authority in 2016, there were 1,258 incidents of lasers being pointed at aircraft. In the future, those who deliberately target aircraft with lasers could face a jail sentence or hefty fine. Currently, shining lasers at planes has a penalty of up to £2,500.
Pointing a laser pointer at an aircraft is illegal (so don’t do it regardless of what pointer is being used).
Obviously, I reiterate again, pointing a laser at a moving vehicle such as a plane, helicopter, car motorbike, boat, yacht, etc can be deemed as an act of terrorism, it does not matter why a perpetrator has engaged in such an act but more so that they executed their action and this is punishable by law.
For pilots to be affected and injured because of this act, the laser would have to directly be pointed at their eyes, or for they to experience a flash-blind effect.
According to The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO)
While many claims have been made for ocular and other injuries, as a result of exposure to laser pointers, none has been sustained. Most victims are unaware of the clinical symptoms that would be appropriate to retinal injury; thus many individuals claim to have seen a bright light followed by pain or irritation in the irradiated eye. Some also complain of redness of the eye and headaches. In reality, there are no pain receptors in the retina and, therefore, threshold laser strike in the visible region of the spectrum is not associated with pain.
I personally think all journalists and media should use the phrase:
“Anyone caught using a laser pointer publicallyfor illegal purposes will be arrested and punished under the terrorism act”, which adds MORE CLOUT than a minimum sentence of 5 years, going as far as spreadingawareness in bold campaigns that show how dangerous laser pointers can be.
“Good Journalism Does Not Cause Confusion”.
It does not take much effort to log details of who the device was sold to, making verification ID mandatory in the UK. However, to stop people from buying them from abroad is another matter and there would have to be an import ban from other countries to the consumer and only legitimate organizations that were licensed would have access.
BJO states and I quote “that in conclusion, laser pointers, pens, or key rings if used appropriately are not an eye hazard, and even if used inappropriately will not cause permanent eye damage”.
FINAL THOUGHTS.
“It is sad that in this day and age with an array of social media platforms, we are censored for the things we write. I am all for censorship if it promotes hate crime or worse. But when it comes to merely expressing an opinion or asking a question we should not be scrutinized. There is little room for freedom of speech anymore and we cannot ask questions as people will question our motives and get defensive. I believe if people have questions they should be able to express them without the fear of someone trolling themand without the fear of being censored or punished”.
Pointing any laser device to a moving vehicle eg: (planes, trains, cars, motor bikes, boats) or directly at someone to purposely maim including eyes and body, for the purpose to cause destruction and accidents, the perpetrators should be punished to fit the crime.
According to this article distances of up to 1200 feet can engulf a cockpit. It remains a distraction hazard all the way up to 12,000 feet.
The point is:
The maximum altitude that a helicopter can be reached during forward flight typically depends more on the ability of the engine. Helicopters can reach around 25,000 feet. But the maximum height at which a helicopter can hover is much lower – a high-performance helicopter like the Agusta A109E can hover at 10,400 feet. However, if the helicopter remains in ‘ground effect’ – ie, if it is hovering close to high ground – its maximum hover altitude will be higher. The Agusta can hover in ground effect – ‘HIGE’ in helicopter jargon – at 13,800 feet. This is useful for mountain rescue missions.
I would also like to add I am a law-abiding citizen and if I was to catch anyone pointing lasers for illegal purposes, other than for the purpose of business, education, or pet entertainment, I would report them to the authorities without question.
I’m not sure what to make of this and to be honest, did not know really what to do with it. I would also like to add a disclaimer “I am not spreading fake news or conspiracy theories and have not come to a definitive conclusion”. I suggest my readers do their own research and make their own minds up.
Fake News? – Leaked Canadian Paper.
Is this leaked info really Trudeau’s crazy COVID plan for 2021? You decide…
As I skimmed through all my inboxes this morning I came a cross an email that I had received through a contact form on one of my sites. As you can imagine I have a lot of emails and have my fair share of crank, scam garbage. But as I read through it I could see this email was different it wasn’t asking me for money and had nothing to do with financial trading.
I also do not condone fake news, and conspiracy theories and work on facts. I always try to find the source of what I write to match my content. This is controversial and am still not sure what to make of it.
I did not know what to make of this email at first and was skeptical until I watched the youtube video: https://youtu.be/AzWLlfwfD4Y I will leave it for you to decide, feel free to leave your comments as I am curious about people’s reactions to this…..
Comment & State Your Domain Name.
w: LPC Strategic Committee LeakInboxLPC leaker 1:47 PM (7 hours ago) Hello, Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 10, 2020, 1:38 PM, REMOVED wrote: Dear *******, I want to provide you with some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning Committee (which is steered by the PMO). I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is that roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes. The road map and aim were set out by the PMO and is as follows: Phase in secondary lockdown restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020. Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020. Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond the capacity of testing, including increases in COVID-related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by the end of November 2020. Complete and total secondary lockdown (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021 Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021. Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with a secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with a much higher mortality rate and a higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021. Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21-related deaths will exceed medical care facilities’ capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021. Enhanced lockdown restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021. Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid-Q2 2021. Projected supply chain breakdowns, inventory shortages, and large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021. Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021. Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning Committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on an international scale, the federal government was going to offer Canadians total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) and all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness, the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lockdown (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass). Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “The World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individual’s best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lockdown restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time, as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities, they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized. So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite a heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end, it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it won’t just be Canada in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and the ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it. All I know is that I don’t like it and I think it’s going to place Canadians into a dark future. Full Link: https://thecanadianreport.ca/is-this-leaked-memo-really-trudeaus-covid-plan-for-2021-you-decide/ Alternate Link: https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4551385/pg1?c1=1&c2=1&disclaimer=Continue Youtube Link based on email leak: Questions: What’s Going On??? https://youtu.be/AzWLlfwfD4Y
Fake News? – Leaked Paper – Controversial Email.
According to Trudeau the Canadian Prime Minister who said he had to personally reassure a young woman during a recent virtual meeting that his government will not remove people from their homes to put them in containment facilities.
Trudeau said the best thing that Canadians can do is to listen to trusted experts such as Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam and regional health officials. “We need to hold together and resist people who would sow chaos within our communities and our democracy,”.
“The best thing Canadians can do, [they] can listen to experts, can listen to doctors, can listen to people who are focused on keeping them safe every single day, whether it’s wearing your mask, whether it’s keeping your distance, whether it’s getting the COVID alert app, or whether it’s eventually getting vaccinated when we have a successful and safe vaccine.”
I personally think you should watch the youtube videos before making your mind up and do feel free to do more research.
This site has affiliate links and the publisher (us) may get a commission on clicks per action when purchases and registrations are made by the user. (CPA). This site is owned by UK Website Designers part of a group of sites and domains in an SEO Link Wheel, which can be viewed here!
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
